Search Results for "Gujarat High Court Rules"

2519 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2519 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Decides Appeal Regarding Retrospective Reassessment of Property Tax Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. Single Judge had Quashed Orders and Demands Reassessing Rateable Value from 1-4-2000.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai issued special notices in 2001 and 2002 reassessing the rateable value of Dalamal Tower Premises Co-operat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Family Dispute Case — Criminal Proceedings Abuse of Process. Court holds that private complaint between family members over property disputes does not disclose criminal offences under Sections 504, 506, 416, 419, 420, 34 IPC.

The petitioners, Smt. Thara Peethambaram (mother) and Dr. Krishnarjun Peethambaram (son), filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC (read with Section 5...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Extension of Justice Shetty Commission Benefits to Family Court Staff. The court held that staff of Family Courts at Aurangabad and Nagpur are entitled to the same benefits as staff in other districts under the Family Courts Act, 1984.

The petitioners, who were staff members of the Family Courts at Aurangabad and Nagpur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition for Pensionary Benefits of Employee Transferred to Central University. Resignation for Public Employment Not Voluntary Abandonment, Pro Rata Pension Payable Under Rule 131 of Gujarat Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2002.

The petitioner, Dr. Anjan Bhattacharya, was appointed as Assistant Professor at Veterinary College, SKADU under Gujarat Agricultural University on 05....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Presumption under Section 139 of NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused as Signature on Cheque Admitted and Statutory Notice Complied With.

The appellant, M/s. Indian Potash Limited, a company engaged in importing and marketing fertilizers, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negoti...