Bombay High Court Decides Appeal Regarding Retrospective Reassessment of Property Tax Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. Single Judge had Quashed Orders and Demands Reassessing Rateable Value from 1-4-2000.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai issued special notices in 2001 and 2002 reassessing the rateable value of Dalamal Tower Premises Co-operative Society Limited's commercial building at Nariman Point. The society objected and later challenged the reassessment orders dated 24 March 2004 which revised rateable value retrospectively from 1 April 2000 for the years 2000-2001 to 2003-2004. The society filed statutory appeals before the Small Causes Court and a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The Single Judge allowed the writ petition on 14 October 2004, quashing the reassessment orders and tax demands insofar as they sought to impose retrospective revision. The Society contended that the reassessment beyond the current official year violated Section 167 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, and that the cooperative society as the assessee could not be split into self-occupied and tenanted units for separate assessment. The Corporation appealed the Single Judge's order. The Division Bench heard arguments from senior counsel for both sides, including references to an earlier Division Bench order dated 23 October 2002 directing fresh assessment in accordance with law. The appeal was reserved for judgment on 3 March 2006 and pronounced on 27 March 2006.

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned reassessment of rateable value with retrospective effect from 1 April 2000 was valid under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888? Whether the petitioner cooperative society or its members/occupiers are the assessee for property tax? Whether separate assessment of self-occupied and tenanted/licensed units is permissible?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Reassessment under section 167 cannot have retrospective effect beyond commencement of current official year
  • Cooperative society is assessee for entire building not unit occupiers
  • Self-occupied premises not assessable separately from let out premises
  • Repeal of old Rent Act does not alter assessment scheme
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (03) 24

Appeal No. 801 of 2004 in Writ Petition No. 2120 of 2004

2006-03-27

R.M. Lodha, Anoop V. Mohta

K.K. Singhvi, Birenra Saraf, V.K. Khatu, Aspi Chinoy, D.J. Khambatta, M.S. Mustafa, A.S. Doctor, Amjad Sayed

The Municipal Corporation of Brihanmumbai & Ors.

Dalamal Tower Premises Co-operative Society Limited & Ors. and State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against order of Single Judge quashing reassessment orders and tax demands.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner society sought quashing of reassessment orders dated 24-3-2004 and consequent tax bills with retrospective effect from 1-4-2000.

Filing Reason

Corporation reassessed rateable value retrospectively for 2000-2004, society contended it was illegal and in violation of Section 167 and binding precedents.

Previous Decisions

Single Judge allowed writ petition on 14-10-2004, making rule absolute in terms of prayers (a) and (b) thereby quashing the orders and demands.

Issues

Whether reassessment can have retrospective effect beyond the current official year? Whether society or individual unit occupiers are the assessee for property tax? Whether orders and bills are valid under the Act?

Submissions/Arguments

The impugned orders and bills were in violation of law laid down in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. Jeeven Jyot Office & Business Premises Co-operative Society Limited. The assessee for property tax is the society as a whole; self-occupied and tenanted/licensed units cannot be assessed separately. The Corporation cannot impose revised rateable value retrospectively beyond the current official year, contrary to Section 167 and binding judgments.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned single Judge allowed the writ petition filed by the present respondent Nos.1 and 2 and quashed and set aside the orders dated 24th March, 2004 (Exhibits 'O1', 'O2' and 'P') and the demands of payment pursuant to the bills (Exhibits 'R', 'S1' to 'S8') so far as the present appellants sought to reassess the rateable value with effect from 1st April, 2000. The learned Single Judge issued rule and at the motion hearing disposed of the rule by the impugned order dated October 14, 2004 by making it absolute in terms of prayers (a) and (b) aforequoted.

Procedural History

Special notices dated 29-3-2001 and 22-3-2002 reassessed rateable value for 2000-2001 and 2001-2002. Society filed complaints. Corporation issued reassessment orders dated 24-3-2004 fixing enhanced rateable values retrospectively from 1-4-2000 to 31-3-2004 with demands. Society filed statutory appeals under Section 217 before Small Causes Court on 2-4-2004. Society also filed writ petition challenging the reassessment. Single Judge allowed the writ on 14-10-2004. Corporation filed the present appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888: 167, 162(2), 217
  • Constitution of India, 1950: 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Decides Appeal Regarding Retrospective Reassessment of Property Tax Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. Single Judge had Quashed Orders and Demands Reassessing Rateable Value from 1-4-2000.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Appellate Eviction Decree Under Bombay Rent Act — Tenants Claim Protection Under Section 53A Transfer of Property Act and Adverse Possession. The Court Examined Issues of Res Judicata and Validity of Demand ...