Search Results for "Construction Restriction"

1243 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1243 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of Pune Development Control Rules Allowing Municipal Takeover of Private Open Spaces for ₹1 Compensation. Petitioners Claim Violation of Right to Property under Article 300A and Lack of Statutory Basis in BPMC Act.

Five writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of the Development Control Rules ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Validity of Retrospective Amendment to Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Amendment Deeming Refining of Oil as Manufacture is Challenged as Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Godrej Soaps Ltd., a public limited company engaged in manufacturing and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Application for Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Recovery of Possession by Public Trust. No Prior Consent of Charity Commissioner Required under Sections 50/51 of Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 for Suit Against Trespassers; Civil Court Not Barred under Section 80.

The dispute arose from an interim application filed by Defendant No.1 in a civil suit instituted by Shri Hari Ashram, a public charitable trust regist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeal Under Section 14 of Admiralty Act Against Single Judge Order Dismissing Defendant's Notice of Motion. The dispute concerned breach of a bareboat charterparty and a subsequent time charterparty regarding a vessel.

The original plaintiff, Siem Offshore Rederi AS, a Norwegian company, filed Admiralty Suit (L) No. 20 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Civil Appeals Against NCLAT Order Dismissing Company Petition for Oppression and Mismanagement. NCLAT Had Held NCLT Lacked Jurisdiction to Decide Fraud and Coercion in Summary Proceedings, Directing Civil Suit Under Sections 31 and 34 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The dispute arose from a company petition filed by Mrs. Shailja Krishna, the appellant, under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956, before ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Against Sick Industrial Company — Suspension of Proceedings Under Section 22(1) of SICA Does Not Bar Suit for Unadmitted Debt. High Court's Grant of 24% Compound Interest Reduced to 12% Simple Interest.

The case involves a dispute between Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. (FCIL), a public sector undertaking, and M/s Coromandal Sacks Private Limited...