WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 1338 OF 2020
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Bombay High Court jurisdiction"
21929 result(s) found
Found 21929 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Petitions Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 — Solatium and Interest Granted on Enhanced Compensation. The court held that solatium under Section 30 and interest under Section 69 of the 2013 Act are mandatory and must be paid on the entire enhanced compensation awarded by the Reference Court.
16 Dec 2021The petitioners, landowners from Sukewadi and Akole in Ahmednagar district, filed writ petitions challenging the judgment of the Reference Court under...
- 59
High Court
High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Concerning Forfeiture of Bid Securities in Tender Process. The Petition Questions Whether the Arbitrator Correctly Interpreted Clause 19.6 of the Tender Instructions and the Law on Bank Guarantees.
4 Feb 2015The dispute arose out of a tender process floated by the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited for supply, construction, and comm...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Application for Dismissal of Election Petition for Non-Compliance with Section 83 of Representation of the People Act, 1951. The court examines whether the failure to file an affidavit in Form 25 along with the petition alleging corrupt practices within the 45-day limitation period mandates dismissal under Section 86 or Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
8 Nov 2006The dispute arose from an election petition filed under Section 80 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, challenging the election of responde...
- 43
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines PIL Filed by Environmental Group Against State Bodies and Developer. Challenge Pertains to Approvals for Construction of Hotel in Coastal Regulation Zone at Morjim, Goa.
17 Sep 2019This Public Interest Litigation filed by two environmental petitioners challenges approvals granted for construction of a hotel/beach resort by respon...
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes High Court Administration's Refusal to Approve Establishment of Additional District Judge and Civil Judge Senior Division Courts at Partur Due to Exclusive State Government Power. Court Rules That Provisions of Maharashtra Civil Courts Act, 1869 Vest Power in State Government to Establish Such Courts Without Requiring Prior High Court Concurrence.
5 May 2016The writ petition was filed by the Partur Advocate Bar Association under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking establishment of Courts of A...
- 128
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Petition Challenging Termination Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Labour Court at Mumbai lacks jurisdiction as cause of action arose in Silchar, Assam, and contract clause limiting jurisdiction to Bombay does not apply to industrial disputes under MRTU & PULP Act.
19 Mar 2019The petitioner, Mr. Anil Murlidharan, was employed by M/s. Larsen and Toubro Limited as a Eutectician from 26 July 1995. He was initially posted at Va...
- 135
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Return of Appeal Memo for Lack of Pecuniary Jurisdiction. Forum of appeal determined by valuation in decree, not plaint valuation under Section 8 of Suits Valuation Act, 1887 and Section 6 of Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869.
26 Jun 2014The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed Regular Civil Suit No.1171 of 2006 seeking declaration that a gift deed dated 10/11/2005 executed by defen...
- 158
High Court
Bombay High Court Discharges Court Receiver in Property Dispute, Directs Parties to Pursue Claims Before DRT. Court holds that once a suit is transferred to DRT, the Court Receiver's role ceases and parties must seek remedies before the Tribunal.
6 May 2021This judgment concerns an application filed by the Court Receiver seeking discharge without passing accounts, subject to payment of costs, charges and...
- 67
High Court
High Court Quashes Bye-Election Notification for Goa Legislative Assembly Seat Due to Insufficient Remaining Term Under Section 151-A of Representation of the People Act, 1951. Election Commission's Notification Declared Illegal as Incoming Member's Term Would Be Less Than One Year from Date of Election Result, Violating Mandatory Proviso Clause (a).
8 Apr 2026The dispute arose from two writ petitions challenging the Election Commission of India's Notification dated 16.03.2026 for conducting a bye-election t...
- 741
