Search Results for "1894"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "1894"

1760 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1760 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Grant of Additional Benefits Under Amended Land Acquisition Act. Reference Court Had Jurisdiction to Correct Award to Include Enhanced Solatium and Interest Under Amending Act 68 of 1984.

9 May 2017

The State of Maharashtra appealed against an order of the Reference Court (Joint District Judge, Nashik) dated 19th February 1992, which granted addit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Grant of Additional Benefits Under Amended Land Acquisition Act — Review Application Maintainable as Reference Was Pending on Amendment Date.

9 May 2017

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the order of the Reference Court (Joint District Judge, Nashik) dated 18th February 1992, which granted addi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Upholds Grant of Additional Benefits Under Amended Act. Reference Court's Order for Enhanced Interest and Solatium Upheld as Amendment Was Pending Reference.

9 May 2017

The State of Maharashtra appealed against an order of the Reference Court (Joint District Judge, Nashik) dated 18th January 1992, which granted additi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Upholds Additional Benefits to Claimant. The Court held that the Reference Court had jurisdiction to grant additional benefits under the Amending Act 68 of 1984 as the reference was pending on the date of amendment.

9 May 2017

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the order of the Reference Court (Joint District Judge, Nashik) dated 29th January 1992, which granted addit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation for Acquired Land Based on Comparable Sale Instances. Court held that the Reference Court erred in rejecting sale instances and that the acquired land had potential for non-agricultural use, warranting higher compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves four first appeals filed by claimants Prabhakar Ramling Choudhari and Sugalabai Prabhakar Choudhari against the State of Maharashtra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhanced from Rs.275-300 to Rs.500 per sq.m. Based on Comparable Sale Deed and Development Potential. Market Value Determined Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with 20% Deduction for Development Charges.

14 Feb 2018

The appellant, Nisar Ahmed Ramzan Momin, owned two plots of land in Village Nizampur, Bhiwandi, Thane, which were acquired by the State for a developm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Furlough Petition for Convict Under Section 376 IPC — Government Notifications Substituted, No Further Relief Required. Conviction for rape under Section 376 IPC is a valid ground for rejecting furlough, and the prayer for rectification of substituted notifications is infructuous.

25 Apr 2018

The petitioner, Pundalik G. Gole, was convicted by the learned Sessions Judge, Mumbai in Sessions Case No. 669 of 2011 for offences under Sections 376...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging CIDCO's Land Allotment Cancellation — Upholds Public Auction Requirement for Disposal of Public Land. The court held that CIDCO, as a state instrumentality, must follow public auction or tender for disposal of plots, and any private agreement without such process is void.

4 Oct 2018

The petitioners, Bhumiraj Builders Pvt. Ltd. and Bhupendra Murji Shah, filed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of allotment of certain plot...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging BDA Acquisition Notification for Lack of Alternative Remedy and Delay. Petitioners' challenge to preliminary notification under Section 17 of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 fails as they did not avail statutory remedy of filing objections under Section 17(3) and approached court after 16 years.

1 Mar 2019

The petitioners, including a housing cooperative society and several individuals, filed writ petitions challenging the preliminary notification dated ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Validity of Acquisition for Bangalore Development Authority. Landowners' challenge to acquisition proceedings fails as court finds no violation of statutory provisions under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976.

5 Sep 2019

The appellants, Sri A. Chandrashekar and Smt Kempamma, filed a writ appeal against the State of Karnataka and others, challenging the acquisition of t...

57 58 59 60 61

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)