Search Results for "tax refund"

1175 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1175 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Illegal Tax Collected by Grama Panchayath from Poultry Farm Owner. Levy of Property Tax on Agricultural Land Used for Poultry Farming Held Unauthorized Under Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

The petitioner, K Narasimhamurthy, is the absolute owner of agricultural land bearing No.35 measuring 4 acres situated at Nagasandra Village, Sondekop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows JSW Steel's Challenge to Electricity Duty Demand on Captive Consumption. Held that electricity generated from captive power plant and consumed for own use is not 'sold' and thus not exigible to electricity duty under the Bombay Electricity Duty Act, 1958.

The petitioner, M/s. JSW Steel Limited, a company engaged in steel manufacturing, operates a captive power plant (CPP) at its factory in Raigad, Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Income Tax Dispute — Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020 Applicability. Court holds that a Miscellaneous Application under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 filed against an appeal dismissed in limine is covered under the DTVSV Act, 2020.

The petitioner, Oerlikon Balzers Coating India Private Limited, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the rejection ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in Service Tax Case Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Jurisdiction. Refundable deposit received from SEZ developer not taxable as service, and 10-year delay in issuing SCN violates principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Coventry Estates Pvt. Ltd. (formerly S and H Services Pvt. Ltd.), was engaged in construction of a residential complex in a Special Ec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MVAT Case — Works Contract Valuation Must Exclude Land Value Under Rule 58. Land value deduction under Rule 58 of MVAT Rules is mandatory for works contracts involving transfer of immovable property, and the Tribunal erred in restricting deduction to 20%.

The Appellant, Oasis Realty, an association of persons registered under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act) and Central Sales Tax Act...