COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 371 OF 2019
11 Dec 2019...
Search Results for "land surrender"
784 result(s) found
Found 784 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Possession to Executrix Under Will in Redevelopment Dispute — Probate Confirms Right to Flat Despite Tripartite Agreement. The court held that the petitioner, as sole executrix and beneficiary, was entitled to possession of the flat forming part of the estate, and the respondents were bound to honour the agreement entered into with the deceased.
2 Aug 2005The petitioner, Mrs. Clara D'Souza, filed a Notice of Motion seeking a declaration that she, as the sole executrix and beneficiary under the will of t...
- 103
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as evidence of PW-1 was inconsistent with medical report and uncorroborated.
23 Feb 2005The appellant, Sunil Rajabhau Chavan, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Solapur on 19/5/1994 in Sessions Case No.99 of 1993 for the murder of his f...
- 141
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Transfer of Investigation in Criminal Writ Petition No.33 of 2005. Allegations of biased investigation and lethargy found without merit; court directs expeditious completion of investigation within four weeks.
28 Feb 2005The petitioner, a partner of M/s Sonal Corporation, filed a criminal writ petition seeking transfer of investigation in C.R. No.622 of 2004 from Malad...
- 68
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Application in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction Over Sublease Agreement Dispute. Part of Cause of Action Arose in Mumbai Where Agreement Was Executed and Defendant's Office Located.
1 Mar 2013The applicant, Diamond & Gem Development Corporation Limited, was the original defendant No.1 in Short Cause Suit No.818 of 2011 filed by respondent N...
- 107
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Permanent Stay of Winding Up of Svadeshi Mills Company Limited. Section 466 of Companies Act, 1956 does not permit stay of winding up after assets have been sold and substantial progress made in liquidation.
23 Aug 2013The case concerns an appeal against the dismissal of a company application under Section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking a permanent stay of t...
- 109
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Suit for Specific Performance Against Cooperative Housing Society and Members Due to Lack of Privity and Authority. The court held that a cooperative society cannot bind its members to a development agreement without their consent, and the suit was not maintainable.
30 Nov -0001The plaintiff, Vardhman Developers Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of a development agreement against Borla Co-operative Housing Society L...
- 108
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to SRA Committee's Order on Slum Dweller Eligibility. The Court upheld the High Power Committee's jurisdiction to determine eligibility for rehabilitation under the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme, rejecting the petitioners' claim for inclusion of additional tenants.
10 Feb 2015The case involves two writ petitions filed by Housing Development and Infrastructure Ltd. and another challenging the order of the High Power Committe...
- 115
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to DCR 33(7) Appendix III for Lack of Locus Standi and Bonafides. Petitioner failed to establish any public interest or personal injury, leading to dismissal with costs.
28 Jul 2016The petitioner, Mr. Imran Suleman Qureshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging an amendment dated 21/05/2011...
- 85
High Court
High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Conditional Stay on Arbitral Award in Development Agreement Dispute. Court upheld District Court's order requiring deposit of entire award amount with interest for stay under Section 36 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no legal infirmity or perversity warranting interference under Article 227 of Constitution of India.
18 Mar 2026The dispute arose from a development agreement dated 17 November 2015 between the petitioners (developers) and respondents (original owners and stakeh...
- 750
