Search Results for "custody requirement"

1692 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1692 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers Appeals Against Conviction Under NDPS Act for Possession of Commercial Quantity of Charas. Appeals Filed by Six Convicts Challenge Conviction and Sentence of Ten Years Rigorous Imprisonment for Offence Under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of NDPS Act.

The prosecution case was that on 29.11.2009, Lady Police Sub Inspector Mira D'Silva (PW 9), attached to the Anti-Narcotic Police Station, Panaji-Goa, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reviews Conviction of Assistant Teacher Under Sections 376, 354, and 366 IPC. Appeal Challenges Trial Court's Findings on Alleged Rape and Outraging Modesty of a Minor Student.

The appellant, a mathematics teacher at Yashoyash School, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 366 read with 34, 376, and 354 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.549 OF 2013

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds That Deletion of Leave Requirement Under Section 378 CrPC Does Not Automatically Entitle Complainant to Admission of Appeal for Final Hearing. The Court Must Still Apply Its Mind to Merits Before Admitting Appeal.

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by complainants against acquittal. The core legal issue was whether, after the amendment to Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeal Challenging Selection of Assistant Professor in English. Court Upholds University's Decision Based on UGC Regulations and Academic Expert Opinion, Rejecting Claim of Better Qualification.

The appellant, Dr. Sridevi P.G., was an Assistant Professor in English at Karnataka University, Dharwad. She applied for the post of Assistant Profess...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Petition in Testamentary Suit No. 13 of 1994 — Will Not Proved Due to Suspicious Circumstances. Propounders Failed to Discharge Burden of Proving Due Execution Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The plaintiffs, Harish Vithal Kulkarni and Shivanand Vishwanath Warty, claiming to be executors under a Will dated 11th October, 1991 of Mahadeo Sabni...