Search Results for "acquisition notice"

3089 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3089 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Payment of Enhanced Compensation Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Directs Payment Upon Furnishing Bank Guarantee Despite Pending Appeal by Acquiring Body.

The petitioners, owners of land acquired for the Neera Deoghar Project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, sought a writ of mandamus directing the S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case for Metro Car Shed. Petitioners Granted Liberty to File Fresh Petition Under Section 3G of National Highways Act, 1956.

The petitioners, Jyoti Baliram Thorat and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the acquisition of their land by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Land Acquisition Challenge for Malaprabha Project Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioners' challenge to Section 4(1) and Section 6(1) notifications under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 dismissed as they failed to explain delay of over 4 years.

The petitioners, 26 individuals from Gonnagar Village, Ramdurg Taluk, Belgaum District, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Compensation for Land Acquired in 1983 Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioner's claim for compensation after 36 years held barred by delay and laches as no explanation for inaction was provided.

The petitioner, Kiritkumar B. Shah, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notification Due to Inordinate Delay and Laches. Challenge to 1988 notification filed in 2017 held barred by delay and laches as no explanation for 29-year delay was provided.

The petitioners, owners of land in Thippasandra village, Bengaluru, challenged a preliminary notification dated 13.10.1988 issued under Section 4(1) o...