Search Results for "Judicial officers"

4286 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4286 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.1501 OF 2016

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Journalist's Compensation Claim for Handcuffing During Police Transit. No Violation of Articles 14 and 21 Found as Handcuffing Was Justified by Threat of Escape and No Malice Established.

The petitioner, Satish Banwarilal Sharma, a journalist and managing editor of a daily newspaper, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Judicial Officer in POCSO Bribery Case — Rule 5(1)(viii) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1979. Petitioner found guilty of accepting bribe through peon for acquittal in POCSO case; disciplinary proceedings and removal upheld.

The Petitioner, a Judicial Officer appointed in 2009, was removed from service by the State of Maharashtra under Rule 5(1)(viii) of the Maharashtra Ci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Examines Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC — Judgment Incomplete. Accused's Extra-Judicial Confession to Social Worker and Circumstantial Evidence Assessed Without Final Determination.

The appeal arose from a sessions trial where the accused, a practising lawyer, was convicted under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Bank in Transfer Case — Transfer Order Restored with Alternative Posting Options. Allegations of Malafide Transfer Not Established; Bank's Administrative Exigency Upheld.

The case involves a senior officer of Punjab and Sind Bank, Mrs Durgesh Kuwar, who was appointed as a Probationary Officer in 1998 and promoted to Chi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition and Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Inordinate Delay. The court held that the detaining authority failed to apply its mind and the delay of over two years in executing the order vitiated the detention.

The petitioner, Naresh Dua, brother of the detenu Rajesh Dua, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...