Search Results for "Funeral Expenses"

1058 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1058 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal as Not Maintainable Due to Absence of Tribunal's Permission Under Section 170(b) of Motor Vehicles Act. Appeal Against Quantum of Compensation Fails as Insurer Did Not Obtain Leave to Contest Merits Beyond Statutory Defences.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, dealt with an appeal filed by M/s Shriram General Insurance Company Limited against an aw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Insurance Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Remarriage of Widow Does Not Bar Compensation. Multiplier Based on Deceased's Age Upheld, Consortium Reduced.

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the deceased died in a vehicular accident. The claimants, being the parents and widow of the decease...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Appellants Awarded Additional ₹1,50,000 with 6% Interest. Notional Income of Deceased Fixed at ₹6,000 per Month Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 24.08.2016 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, North Goa, in Claim Petition No.43/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Widow and Minor Children of Deceased Awarded Enhanced Compensation for Death of Breadwinner. Negligence of Trax Driver Established; Insurance Company Liable to Pay Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 18/10/2013 passed by the Claims Tribunal, Nagpur in M.A.C.P No.686/2008. The appellants, being the w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Pillion Rider Covered Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Held that the expression 'any person' in Section 163-A includes a pillion rider and that the petition is maintainable even in a hit-and-run case.

The appellant, Lalita wd/o Rajkumar Sawalkar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which was later converted to a...