Search Results for "Companies Amendment Act 2000"

814 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 814 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Central Excise Appeal — No Power to Review Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944. Section 35L of the Act Bars Application of CPC Provisions on Review, Hence Review Petition Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, VIP Industries Ltd., filed a review petition before the Bombay High Court seeking review of an earlier order that dismissed its applic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Policy Circulars in SEIS Benefits Case — Circulars Imposing Additional Conditions for Service Providers Held Ultra Vires. Shipping Agent Entitled to SEIS Benefits as Service Provider Under Foreign Trade Policy.

The petitioner, Atlantic Shipping Private Limited, a shipping agent providing port services and logistical support to foreign clients, challenged the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retirement Age Reduction by National Textile Corporation. Division Bench precedent upholding rollback from 60 to 58 years held binding.

The petitioners, three employees of India United Mills prior to its nationalization under the Sick Textile Undertakings (Nationalization) Act, 1974, c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Eviction Order Under Public Premises Act — Maintainability Challenge Rejected. Division Bench Holds That Writ Petition Under Article 226 Is Maintainable Despite Availability of Revision, and That a Division Bench Has Jurisdiction to Hear Such Petitions.

The petitioner, Mr. Nusli Neville Wadia, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Acquisition Order Under MHADA Act Due to Non-Compliance and Delay. Land Acquisition Proposal Sanctioned in 2006 Set Aside as Authority Failed to Complete Acquisition Within Reasonable Period, Rendering the Order Unenforceable.

The petitioners, H.I.M.S. Botawala Charities (a public charitable trust) and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...