Search Results for "Bail Orders"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Bail Orders"

2331 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2331 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Lack of Commercial Quantity Evidence. The court held that the search and seizure without complying with Section 50 of NDPS Act vitiates the seizure and that the quantity of ganja (45 kg) was not established as commercial, thus Section 37 rigors not attracted.

8 Feb 2021

The petitioner, Sri Ranjith R.S., filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking bail in connec...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in SC/ST Atrocities Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Intent to Humiliate on Caste Basis. Court holds that mere use of caste name without intent to insult does not attract Section 3(1)(r)(s) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

10 Jun 2020

The petitioners, Appoji Reddy and K.V. Subramani, accused Nos. 1 and 2 in Crime No.104/2020 registered by Srinivaspura Police Station, Kolar, filed a ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Money Dispute Case Under Sections 354, 323, 504, 506 IPC. Court Held That Custodial Interrogation Not Required as Dispute Primarily Civil, and Granted Bail Under Section 438 CrPC.

7 Jul 2020

The petitioners, B.M. Mallaiah and Smt. Bhagyamma, filed a criminal petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Attempt to Murder Case — Petitioner Granted Bail on Conditions Due to No Prima Facie Case for Custodial Interrogation. Court Held That Custodial Interrogation May Not Be Necessary and Granted Anticipatory Bail Under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for Offences Under Sections 143, 144, 146, 148, 504, 323, 307 Read With 149 IPC.

7 Jul 2020

The petitioner, Bhaskar, filed a criminal petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking anticipatory bail in Cr...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Conscious Possession and Long Incarceration. The court held that mere partnership in a firm does not establish conscious possession of contraband under Section 43 of NDPS Act, and long custody without trial warrants bail.

28 Apr 2017

The petitioner, Chandru Kunthur Raghuvegowda, a partner of M/s. Overseas Express, filed a petition under Section 439 CrPC seeking bail in Crime No.893...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in CBI Corruption Case Involving Alleged Conspiracy and Forgery. Court Held That Anticipatory Bail Under Section 438 CrPC Is Not to Be Granted as a Matter of Right but Must Be Considered on Merits, and That the Accused Are Entitled to Bail as They Are Not Flight Risks and Have Cooperated with Investigation.

21 Mar 2016

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard two criminal petitions filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Petitions to Quash FIR No.311 of 2012 and Complaint C.C.No.410/SW/2012 Alleging Abuse of Process and False Implication in Matrimonial Dispute. Petitioners seek quashing under Article 226, claiming original complainant lodged false complaint in retaliation to an earlier FIR filed against her family in Punjab.

14 Oct 2013

The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the order dated 9th October 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeals Against Interim Orders in Trademark Infringement Suits. Preliminary Objection Raised That Orders Impugned Do Not Fall Within Appealable Categories Under Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Amended.

17 Oct 2018

These two commercial appeals were filed by the original defendants in intellectual property suits pending before the Bombay High Court. The suits, ins...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Quashing Petition in SFIO Case — Remand Orders Valid Despite Cognizance Issue. Court holds that remand orders under Section 167 Cr.P.C. are independent of cognizance and not subject to challenge under Section 482 Cr.P.C. after filing of complaint.

19 Apr 2022

The applicant, Hari Sankaran, was arrested by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) on 1 April 2019 for an offence punishable under Section 44...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Expunges Adverse Remarks Against Judicial Officer in Anticipatory Bail Order — Remarks Held Unwarranted and Likely to Prejudice Career. The Court held that judicial officers should not be subjected to such criticism for bona fide actions while deciding bail applications under Section 438 CrPC.

4 Oct 2024

The appellant, an Additional District and Sessions Judge in Delhi, passed orders on an anticipatory bail application in which he made adverse observat...

56 57 58 59 60

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)