Search Results for "wrong rule"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "wrong rule"

4983 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4983 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Employee in Pay Revision Case — Recovery from Pensionary Benefits Without Notice Held Unjust. The court held that an order revising pay scale and recovering excess amount from pensionary benefits, passed without affording opportunity of hearing and after retirement, is violative of natural justice and cannot be sustained.

12 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Dr. Gorakh Kashinath Solanki, was initially employed in 1978 as a Junior Assistant Scientist and retired on 31.05.2010 upon attaining ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Holds That Payments Made to Authorized Representatives of Partnership Firm Are Valid Under Contract Act. Burden of Proof Shifts to Defendants When Plaintiff Proves Payment to Persons Held Out as Authorized in Brochure.

31 Mar 2017

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiff, Mr. Sharad Prabhudas, against the judgment of the First Appellate Court which rever...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Income Tax Appeals Filed by Assessee and Revenue Under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961. Multiple Appeals Clubbed for Hearing Involving Assessment Years 2001-2002 to 2004-2005.

25 Mar 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru considers batch of income tax appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging ITAT orders for assessment years 2001-02 to 2004-05. Assessee and Revenue both seek to set aside the ITAT decisions and frame substantial questions of law.

25 Mar 2015

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru dealt with a batch of income tax appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals a...

High Court

Income Tax Appeals by Wipro Limited and Revenue Against Orders of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore for Assessment Years 2001-2002 to 2004-2005

25 Mar 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Discusses First Appeal in Specific Performance Dispute, Highlights Need for Factual Adjudication Over Excessive Citations. The court underscores that judgments must contain analysis of pleadings and evidence rather than merely citing precedents, as required under Section 96 CPC and principles from Narada Smriti.

16 Mar 2020

The High Court of Karnataka was seized of a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arising from the dismissal of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against State's Allotment of Surplus Land Under ULC Act — Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Right After Repeal. Land vested in the State under Sections 8, 9, and 10 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, prior to its repeal, remains with the State and cannot revert merely because the Act was subsequently repealed.

27 Oct 2016

The matter before the Bombay High Court arose from a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by Chhaganlal Khimji and Co. L...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Banning Order Issued by Public Sector Undertaking – Allegations of Blacklisting Without Proper Notice and Violation of Fundamental Rights. Petitioner Contends That Show Cause Notice Did Not Specify Intention to Ban for Three Years, Rendering Order Arbitrary.

27 Oct 2016

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a private limited company engaged in corrosion resistant coating applica...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Decides Writ Petition Against ONGC's Banning Order. Petitioner Challenges Three-Year Blacklisting on Grounds of Natural Justice Violation.

27 Oct 2016

The petitioner, M/s J.K. Surface Coatings Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in corrosion resistant coating application, challenged a banning order dated 25...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Industrial Court's Rejection of Interim Relief in ULP Complaint Over Jurisdiction Under Schedule II of MRTU & PULP Act. Workers Alleged Forced Resignations and Unfair Labour Practices; Court Framed Issues on Whether Industrial Court Could Consider Terminations Under Schedule II.

3 Jul 2019

(1) Background: The dispute arose from an industrial complaint filed by eleven workers against their employer, M/s Motherson Advanced Tooling Solution...

55 56 57 58 59

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)