Search Results for "trust dispute"

3998 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3998 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for Airport Land Acquisition in Marol Village — Market Value Fixed at Rs. 90 per sq. m. for 1981 and 1982 Notifications. Court Relies on Expert Valuer's Report and Rejects SLAO's Low Valuation Based on Inadequate Comparable Sales.

The judgment pertains to two Land Acquisition References (LAR No.18 of 1988 and LAR No.19 of 1988) filed by A.H. Wadia Charity Trust (the Claimant) se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Dargah Land Dispute, Upholds Mutawalis' Right to Possession. Suit for Possession Based on Title Governed by 12-Year Limitation Under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a dispute over agricultural lands situated at village Haregaon, Tq. Ausa, Dist. Latur, claimed by the plaintiffs (respondents herein...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reduces Penalty in Stamp Duty Dispute for Deed of Assent Treated as Gift Deed. Collector's Imposition of Maximum Ten-Times Penalty Set Aside for Lack of Reasoning and Discretionary Exercise.

The case involves a dispute over stamp duty and penalty imposed on a Deed of Assent executed by the Trustees of H.C. Dhanda Trust. Late Shri Harish Ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Sub-Tenant in Rent Control Matter. Sub-tenant with paid-up capital less than Rs 1 crore held entitled to protection under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 despite tenant's exclusion under Section 3(1)(b).

The case involves a dispute over the applicability of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 to a sub-tenant. The applicant, Frick India Ltd, claimed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Trust Property Suit. Court Fees Held Properly Paid as Suit Was for Injunction, Not Recovery of Money.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendants (applicants) challenging an order of the trial court dated 15/11/2016 ...