Search Results for "section 376"

1813 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1813 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape of Mentally Retarded Woman Due to Lack of Consent Evidence. Conviction under Section 376(2)(l) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove absence of consent and knowledge of mental retardation.

The present appeal challenged the conviction and sentence of the appellant under Section 376(2)(l) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for the rape o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sakre Bosaiah, was convicted by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chitradurga, in Sessions Case No. 53/2009 for offences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Unreliable Child Witnesses and Lack of Evidence of Sexual Assault. Conviction for Rape and Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Penetration Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Bandu s/o Natthuji Raut, was convicted by the Special Judge, Yavatmal, for offences under Sections 451, 376(2)(i)(j)(1) of the Indian P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 5(j)(ii) and (l) r/w 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(j)(n) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Abdul Riyaz @ Riyaz Pasha, was convicted by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chamarajanagar, in Special Case No.80/2014 for o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shamlal s/o Punaram Achale, was convicted by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara in Sessions Trial 139/2001 for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age of Victim and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 366A, 344, 376(2)(n) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Anil S/o Bhayrappa Khairav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, FTSC-I (POCSO), Vijayapura, in Special Case (POCSO) No.15/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Penalty Under Excise Rules for Short-Lifting of Liquor. The court heard arguments on additional grounds after noting that the issue was covered by a previous order in Lakshmi Bar and Restaurant Case.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of connected writ petitions filed by several CL-9 licence holders, including M/s. High Point Hotels Pvt. Ltd...