WRIT PETITION NO.1807 OF 2024
21 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "developer permission"
647 result(s) found
Found 647 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Structure in Eco-Sensitive Zone. Construction in Prohibited Area Without Valid Permission Violates Environment Protection Act and CRZ Notification.
9 May 2022The petitioners, M/s. Sai Pushp Enterprises and Yogesh Govind Puranik, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of their structure by the Than...
- 192
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Shops in Municipal Council Pathri — Petitioners Failed to Establish Right Over Public Property. Unauthorized Construction on Municipal Land Without Permission Cannot Be Regularized Under Section 52 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
13 Mar 2020The petitioners, 29 individuals, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of their shops by the Municipal Council, Pathri, and seeking regular...
- 59
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Capital Gains Tax Case — Land Held Agricultural Despite Sale to Resort Developer. The court affirmed that the land's actual agricultural use and revenue classification, not its potential for non-agricultural use, determine its character for exemption under Section 45 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
9 Sep 2010The case involves two tax appeals by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the respondents, Smt. Debbie Alemao and Shri Joaquim Alemao, who were co-o...
- 99
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.
29 Jul 2011This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment to Bhartiya Vidya Bhavan for School and Playground. Court upholds allotment as consistent with development plan reservation and public interest.
20 Oct 2012The case is a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Dr. Surendra Ramlal Tiwari and Trimurty Nagar Ground Bachav Kruti Samiti challenging the allot...
- 104
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Process Issued Against Petitioners in Maharashtra Fire Prevention Act Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 36 Renders Complaint Invalid. Court held that prior sanction of the Commissioner is mandatory for prosecution under Sections 3(1), 3(3), 3(4) r/w 36 of the Maharashtra Fire Prevention and Life Safety Measures Act, 2006, and its absence vitiates the criminal proceedings.
6 May 2013The petitioners, seven residents of Jolly Maker I Cooperative Housing Society in Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution o...
- 122
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Rejects Application for Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Agreement for Sale Not Concluded Contract but Continuous Offer, Plaint Discloses Cause of Action.
17 Nov 2025The appellant, M/s. Everhome Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 15.07.2019 against the respond...
- 136
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Environmental Clearance for Resort Construction in CRZ Area Subject to Conditions — Public Trust Doctrine and Precautionary Principle Applied to Protect Coastal Ecology and Local Livelihoods.
30 Nov -0001The judgment arises from a Public Interest Litigation and connected writ petitions challenging the environmental clearance granted to M/s. Leading Hot...
- 91
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Temporary Injunction in Specific Performance Suit — Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Found in Favour of Plaintiff-Builder Under Memorandum of Understanding. The court held that the Memorandum of Understanding dated 21.5.2011 constituted a binding agreement for sale and the plaintiff had made out a prima facie case for grant of injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.
5 May 2017The appellant, M/s. Merces Builders Private Limited, filed an appeal against an order dated 16.4.2016 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Panaji...
- 136
