Search Results for "corresponding provision"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "corresponding provision"

2131 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2131 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition to Restore Suit Dismissed for Default, Setting Aside Order That Rejected Restoration on Ground of Arbitration Agreement. Court holds that dismissal for default does not bar restoration and that the trial court must decide the application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 on merits.

25 Sep 2025

The petitioner, K. M. Dastagir Sab, filed a suit (O.S.No.1280/2020) before the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, seeking rel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — State Not Liable for Delay in Obtaining Approvals. The court held that the State Government did not breach the Joint Venture Agreement by failing to obtain necessary approvals within a reasonable time, as the agreement did not impose an absolute obligation on the State.

11 May 2012

The appellant, Carol Info Services Limited, entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with the State of Maharashtra to establish a super specialty hospit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes BPCL Circular Imposing Refill Ceiling Limits on LPG Distributors as Unilateral and Arbitrary. Distributorship Agreements Without Ceiling Limits Cannot Be Varied Unilaterally by Issuing Circulars.

30 Sep 2019

The petitioners, seven LPG distributors of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), challenged a circular dated 4 January 2018 and a subsequent co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Arbitration Petitions Against Guarantors Due to Limitation and Lack of Arbitration Agreement. The court held that claims against guarantors were barred by limitation and that the arbitration clause in the loan agreement did not extend to guarantors who were not signatories.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves three arbitration petitions filed by Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank Ltd. against various respondents, including Rainproof Exports Pvt. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of 77 Employees Seeking Permanency Against Nagpur Municipal Corporation — Seasonal Workers Not Entitled to Automatic Permanent Status Under Model Standing Orders. The Court held that the burden of proving continuous service of 240 days in the preceding year was not discharged and the employer's classification of workers as seasonal was not arbitrary.

22 Mar 2006

The petitioners, 77 employees of the Nagpur Municipal Corporation, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 13.12.1994 of the Industrial Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs State to Formulate Comprehensive Policy for Prevention of Farmer Suicides. Court holds that the State must provide ex-gratia assistance to families of farmers who committed suicide due to agricultural indebtedness, recognizing the constitutional duty under Article 21.

5 May 2006

The judgment arises from a Public Interest Litigation initiated by a letter from the All India Bio Dynamic and Organic Farming Association to the Chie...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 for Debt Disputed in Good Faith. Petition Filed to Exert Pressure for Unreasonable Demands, Not for Recovery of Genuine Debt.

7 Jun 2006

The petitioner, Fomento Resorts And Hotels Ltd., filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 against the respondent, G...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Cooperative Society Mortgage Dispute — Section 164 Notice Not Required When Suit Filed Against Non-Member. Purchaser of property not a member of cooperative society is not required to serve notice under Section 164 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act before filing suit for injunction against the society.

12 Aug 2014

The appellant, Gajanan Eknath Sonankar, purchased agricultural land Gat No. 83 admeasuring 2 Acres at Mouja Lasura Bk., Tq. Shegaon, Dist. Buldhana by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Blacklisting Order Against Contractor in ONGC Contract Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice as Show Cause Notice Did Not Specify Proposed Penalty. Show Cause Notice Must Clearly Indicate Intended Action of Blacklisting to Afford Meaningful Opportunity of Hearing Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Anchor Offshore Services Ltd (Anchor), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged a blacklisting order dated 5th...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Facilitation Council Award for Interest on Delayed Payments Under MSMED Act — Limitation Period for Reference Not Applicable. The court held that the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 is a complete code and the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to references made under Section 18(3) of the MSMED Act.

15 Nov 2016

The petitioners, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited and others, successors of the erstwhile Maharashtra State Electricity Boar...

55 56 57 58 59

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)