Search Results for "consent vitiated"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "consent vitiated"

1795 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1795 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Lease Dispute Due to Improper Points for Determination and Violation of Evidence Act. Appellate Court's reliance on oral evidence despite requirement of written lease under Clause 4 of agreement dated 04/05/1977 held erroneous.

16 Feb 2021

The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit for possession and mesne profits concerning a property in Mapusa, Goa. The appellants (defendant...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Cooperative Housing Society Challenging Refund of Transfer Fees Paid Under Coercion. Payment of 3% of consideration as transfer fees disguised as repair fund contribution held illegal and recoverable with interest under Section 22 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

17 Feb 2010

The petitioner, Bharatiya Bhavan Cooperative Housing Society Limited, challenged the orders of the First Cooperative Court and the Maharashtra State C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Revocation of Permission to Sell Trust Property in Bombay Public Trusts Act Case — Joint Charity Commissioner's Order Upheld as Sale Not for Benefit of Trust. Permission Under Section 36(1)(b) of Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 Revoked Under Section 36(2) Due to Non-Compliance and Lack of Benefit to Trust.

11 Apr 2014

The petitioner, M/s. Arole Construction Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable Despite Policy Commencing After Accident Time. Policy effective from 15/06/2006 covers accident on 14/06/2006 at 20:45 hrs as policy commences from midnight, and insurer cannot escape liability under Section 147 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

22 Jun 2017

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the original claimant (since deceased) sought compensation for injuries sustained in a vehicular acc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over HAMON Mark. Plaintiff's registered trademark 'HAMON' found to be infringed by Defendant's use of 'HAMON COOLING' and 'HCS HAMON COOLING' in trade and corporate name.

6 Jul 2026

The Plaintiff, John Cockerill Hamon SA, filed a Commercial IP Suit alleging infringement and passing off of its registered trademark 'HAMON' by the De...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad dismisses writ petitions by trust against concurrent rejection of change reports under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act. Multiple change reports filed under Section 22 rejected by charity authorities; High Court to decide if concurrent orders are sustainable.

24 Dec 2025

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, adjudicated a batch of writ petitions filed by Shree Datta Deosthan Trust, a religious trust...

High Court

Bombay High Court Passes Order on Interim Plea Over Yes Bank Management Rights Claimed by Heirs of Ashok Kapur. Core Issue Involves Interpretation of Articles of Association Regarding Heritability of Co-founder's Defined Privileges Following His Death in 2008 Mumbai Terror Attacks.

4 Jun 2015

The judgment deals with a Notice of Motion taken out by the legal heirs of late Ashok Kapur, co-founder of Yes Bank, who perished in the November 2008...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Proceedings. The Court upheld the validity of the NIA's takeover of investigation and the sanction order under Section 45(2) UAPA, finding that the timeline for independent review is directory and the cognizance order was based on prima facie material.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in Property Dispute Between Brothers, Remands for Fresh Consideration on Limitation and Evidence Appreciation. The court held that the First Appellate Court must discuss evidence and cannot ignore a finding on limitation that has attained finality.

9 Jul 2010

The case involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute between brothers. The appellants (Ulhas Shankar Barde and Urmila Ulhas Barde) and...

55 56 57 58 59

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)