Search Results for "carry forward and set off"

597 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 597 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Client Against Trading Member for Unauthorized Trades. Award of Rs.6,59,634.54 with interest upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Angel Broking Private Limited, a trading member, challenged an arbitral award dated 29 August 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator appoint...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Kerala's Challenge to Union's Borrowing Ceiling to Constitution Bench — Raises Substantial Questions on Interpretation of Article 293 and Federal Fiscal Powers. The Court declined interim relief pending reference, noting the mandatory nature of the injunction sought.

The State of Kerala instituted an original suit under Article 131 of the Constitution of India against the Union of India, challenging three actions: ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to PFI Accused in UAP Act Case — No Prima Facie Case of Waging War Against Government. Allegations of conspiracy under Section 121-A IPC and Section 13(1)(b) UAP Act not made out as acts alleged fall under Sections 153-A, 153-B, 295-A IPC.

The Bombay High Court allowed three criminal appeals filed by accused nos. 2, 3, and 6 in a case arising from FIR No. 20/2021 registered by the Anti T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Refund of Forfeited Auction Amount in SARFAESI Sale Due to Bank's Failure to Issue Sale Certificate. Bank's Failure to Perform Reciprocal Promise Discharges Bidder from Obligation to Pay Balance.

The petitioner, Sri Kalyanamurthy K., participated in an e-auction conducted by the State Bank of India (respondent) for the sale of an immovable prop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appointment of Law Officer Group B in Police Department — No Right to Appointment by Mere Participation in Selection Process. Petitioner Failed to Establish Illegality in Appointment of Respondent No.3 Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Ms. Surekha Ragho Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Execution of Foreign Court's Costs Order. Foreign judgment imposing costs is a decree enforceable under Section 44A of CPC, 1908, and the executing court cannot go behind the decree.

The Petitioner, M/s. Alcon Electronics Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 15th April, 2011 passed by the learned District Judge-2, Nashik, which rej...