Search Results for "arbitrators jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "arbitrators jurisdiction"

804 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 804 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitral Tribunal's Jurisdictional Order as Not Maintainable. Remedy Lies Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 After Final Award.

22 Apr 2021

The petitioner, Tirupati Shopping Centre Premises Co-op. Society Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Indi...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Grounds of Jurisdiction and Limitation. Dispute involves multiple hotel management agreements and the applicability of arbitration clauses after partial setting aside of a prior award.

17 Dec 2025

The dispute arises from a series of hotel management agreements concerning a hotel at Lonavala owned by petitioner Laguna Resorts Pvt. Ltd. (formerly ...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Upholds Arbitral Tribunal's Jurisdiction and Interest Award Under MSMED Act. Court held that remedy under Section 18 of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 is optional, not exclusive, and ad hoc arbitration permissible, with interest under Section 16 MSMED Act upheld.

10 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a contract for supply of VRLA batteries between Petitioner, a government enterprise, and Respondent, a company registered under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Declines Section 11 Jurisdiction, Holds Calcutta High Court Appropriate When Earlier Section 9 Application Filed Before City Civil Court, Kolkata. The Court applies Ravi Ranjan principle, holding that the High Court exercising supervisory jurisdiction over the district court first moved under the Act is the correct Section 11 court, even if the parties' agreement confers jurisdiction on another High Court.

12 Jun 2025

The case arose from loan agreements between Tata Motors Finance Solution Ltd (now merged into Tata Capital Limited) and Parbez Hamid, containing arbit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Infrastructure Facility Agreement Dispute — Disputes Referable to Arbitration Despite Allegations of Repudiation. The court held that issues of repudiation and limitation are for the arbitral tribunal to decide under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 Jun 2022

The applicant, Priya Malay Sheth, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbit...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Arbitrator Appointment in ISRO Contract Dispute Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. Appointment by Delhi Arbitration Centre without consent of Union of India held invalid under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

22 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Union of India represented by the Ministry of Space (ISRO), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of In...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will Executed on Same Day as Testatrix's Death, Upholding Its Validity Despite Challenge by Legal Heir. The court held that the execution of the Will was duly proved by attesting witnesses and the suspicious circumstances were dispelled.

7 Sep 2023

The plaintiff, Pravin Laxmidas Tanna, filed a suit seeking probate of the last Will and Testament dated 15.01.2004 of Savita Hiralal Bhindora, who exp...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjudicates Constitutional Challenge to Article 19 of Decree No.35461 on Enforcement of Ecclesiastical Annulment Decrees. Petitions Seek to Nullify Canonical Marriage Annulments and Prevent Civil Endorsements, Questioning the Validity of Pre-Constitution Colonial Law.

15 Oct 2019

Two writ petitions were heard together. In Writ Petition No.351 of 2017, the petitioner wife married the fourth respondent on 26 September 2009 under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction Sale Under SARFAESI Act — Petitioner Failed to Deposit 25% of Sale Price. Condition Precedent Under Rule 9(3) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 Not Fulfilled, and Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act Available.

23 Dec 2025

The petitioner, an individual aged about 70 years, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Rejection of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit — Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Limitation Is a Triable Issue. The court held that under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, only plaint averments are relevant and if they disclose a cause of action, the plaint cannot be rejected; limitation is a mixed question of law and fact.

30 Nov -0001

The applicant, Mr. Ajay Wadhwa, who was original defendant No.9 in the suit, filed a Notice of Motion seeking rejection of the plaint under Order 7 Ru...

55 56 57 58 59

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)