Search Results for "arbitrary administrative action"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "arbitrary administrative action"

1863 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1863 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Writ Petition Against Compulsory Retirement of Former Civil Judge; Alternative Remedy Not Exhausted But Court Proceeds to Hear Merits. Dispute concerns whether judicial officer's grant of bail in non-bailable offenses after rejection by Sessions Court and procedural irregularities under CrPC constitute misconduct warranting compulsory retirement.

26 Jul 2005

The petitioner, a former Joint Civil Judge (Junior Division) and Judicial Magistrate, filed a writ petition under Article 226 before the Bombay High C...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Challenge to CERC's Authority Over Inter-State Open Access Conditions; SLDC's Clause Deemed Contrary to UI Regulations. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission's Order on Unscheduled Interchange Charges Found to Prevail Over SLDC's Imposed Conditions Under Electricity Act, 2003.

30 Apr 2026

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Pension to Casual Labourers with Temporary Status in Department of Posts — Holds That Denial of Pensionary Benefits to Employees Who Rendered Decades of Service Is Arbitrary and Violative of Social Justice Principles. The Court ruled that temporary status casual labourers treated at par with temporary Group D employees are entitled to pension under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, and regularisation is not a precondition.

1 Jun 2026

The case involves three appeals by former casual labourers (Night Guards) of the Department of Posts, or their legal representatives, who challenged t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Declares MSRTC Circular Denying Alternative Employment to Colour-Blind Drivers as Ultra Vires Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. Clause 11 of the impugned circular treating intervening period as leave without pay held contrary to Section 20 of the 2016 Act, which mandates protection of pay and service conditions.

16 Jul 2020

The matter involved fourteen writ petitions filed by drivers employed with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC). The petitioners w...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Minimum Qualifying Marks in Viva-Voce for Judicial Appointments — Rule 41 of Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, 2010 Upheld. The Court held that prescribing a minimum benchmark of 25% marks in interview for District Judge (Direct Recruitment) is neither arbitrary nor unconstitutional, and the challenge became academic due to subsequent amendments.

1 Jan 2026

The appellant, Manoj Goyal, an advocate aspiring to be appointed as an Additional District Judge in Rajasthan, challenged the constitutional validity ...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.323 OF 2000

18 Oct 2005

Multiple writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court by various companies, including Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited and India...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Disinvestment of BPCL and Repeal of Burmah Shell Act — Strategic Disinvestment Policy Not Subject to Legislative Mandate for Prior Parliamentary Approval. The court held that the executive is competent to decide disinvestment under Article 73, and the repeal of the Burmah Shell Act by Finance Act 2016 is valid, with no right of first refusal for employees or dealers.

12 Nov 2020

The judgment concerns four petitions challenging the Union of India's decision to disinvest its shareholding in Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Social Organization to Hold Public Meeting in Nagpur, Directs Police to Grant Permission Without Unreasonable Conditions. The Court upholds the fundamental right to peaceful assembly under Article 19(1)(b) of the Constitution, holding that police cannot refuse permission based on vague law and order apprehensions without specific material.

21 Feb 2020

The petitioners, Bhim Army (Bharat Ekta Mission, Nagpur) and its District President Prafulla Shende, filed a criminal writ petition seeking permission...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging the Process of Designation of Senior Advocates Under Section 16 of the Advocates Act, 1961. The Issue Concerns Whether the Existing System of Designation is Arbitrary and Violative of Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Constitution.

1 Jan 1970

Background: The case concerned a writ petition filed by a Senior Advocate challenging the prevailing system of designation of Senior Advocates in the ...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 4987 OF 2022

2 May 2025

The petitioners, landowners from village Vhanur, Taluka Kagal, District Kolhapur, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...

55 56 57 58 59

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)