Search Results for "agricultural lands"

2154 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2154 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers State Government's Leave Application for Regularization Policy in PILs. Court Examines Whether Draft Policy Violates MRTP Act and Whether Judicial Review Permits Interference with Policy Decisions.

The proceedings arise from two Public Interest Litigations (PIL No. 80 of 2013 and PIL No. 138 of 2012) before the Bombay High Court. In an earlier or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition, Sets Aside Executing Court Order Declining Injunction Due to Functus Officio. Executing Court Retains Jurisdiction Under Section 47 CPC Even After Sending Precept to Collector for Partition, Can Grant Ancillary Reliefs.

The dispute arose from a protracted partition litigation spanning nearly six decades. A decree for administration of an estate and partition was pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Case, Restores Reference Court's Compensation with 10% Development Deduction for Hiwra Dam Project. The Court held that for irrigation projects, development deduction should be minimal and unrebutted expert valuation evidence must be considered.

The appeals arose from land acquisition proceedings for the Hiwra Dam project in Maharashtra. The appellant and respondents No.2 and 3 owned a partner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeals in Tenancy Suo Moto Revision Case — Limitation Not Applicable to Section 84C Powers. Concurrent findings of fact by revenue authorities cannot be interfered with under Article 227 unless perverse.

The case involves a set of intra-court appeals (Letters Patent Appeals) filed against a common judgment dated 21.11.2016 passed by a learned Single Ju...