Search Results for "Regular Bail"

717 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 717 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Commissioner of Customs in Central Excise Case — CESTAT Order Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind. Processing of Cotton Fabrics with Aid of Power Without Following Excise Procedures Constitutes Manufacture Under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax, Rajkot against an order of the Customs, Excise and Servi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148, 149 IPC set aside as evidence of sole eyewitness was inconsistent and not supported by medical or other evidence.

The case arises from a common judgment of the Sessions Court convicting multiple accused for offences including murder, attempt to murder, and rioting...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Appeal for Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty and Desertion — Concurrent Findings of No Cruelty or Desertion Upheld. Husband Failed to Prove Wife's Conduct Amounted to Cruelty or Desertion Under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The appellant-husband filed a petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking divorce on grounds of cruelty and desertion. The parti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice. Notice sent by registered post but not actually delivered to the accused; court holds that presumption of service under Section 27 of General Clauses Act is rebuttable and not automatic.

The applicant, Girish Gangaram Chitta, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in NI Act Case Due to Non-Prosecution. Complainant Bank's Failure to File Evidence Affidavit Despite Presence Justified Acquittal Under Section 256 CrPC.

The appellant, The TJSB Sahakari Bank Ltd., was the original complainant in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Leave to Appeal Against Dismissal of Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act for Default Under Section 256 CrPC. Technical dismissal for absence of complainant set aside, complaint restored for hearing on merits.

The appellant, Prakash Budha Balbudhe, filed a complaint under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, Di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Immoral Trafficking Case Due to Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Sections 373, 366A, 368, 323 IPC and Sections 3, 4 of PITA set aside as sole witness's testimony was inconsistent and uncorroborated.

The appellants, accused Nos. 2 and 3, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, in Sessions Case No.865 of 2002 for offences un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Appointment of Special Public Prosecutor in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Consent from Accused. Appointment under Section 24(8) CrPC Requires Consent of Accused or Victim, Not Third Party Complainant.

The petitioners, Omprakash Baheti and others, are accused in Sessions Trial No. 464/2005 pending before the 6th Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Complainant in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42. Search Conducted Without Recording Information and Without Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Held Illegal, Acquittal Upheld.

The appeal was filed by the original complainant, an Assistant Collector of Central Excise and Customs, Pune, challenging the judgment and order dated...