Bombay High Court Grants Leave to Appeal Against Dismissal of Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act for Default Under Section 256 CrPC. Technical dismissal for absence of complainant set aside, complaint restored for hearing on merits.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Prakash Budha Balbudhe, filed a complaint under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, Dinesh Baburao Madavi, concerning a cheque of Rs. 3,20,000. The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Arjuni (Morgaon), issued process. The respondent initially appeared and furnished bail but later remained absent. The appellant sought issuance of bailable warrant and later non-bailable warrant, paying process fees, but the court did not issue the non-bailable warrant due to non-receipt of police report. The case was transferred to a morning court. On 7 June 2011, when the matter was called, the complainant and his advocate were absent, leading to dismissal of the complaint under Section 256 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The appellant filed an application for leave to appeal against this dismissal. The High Court, per Justice U. V. Bakre, observed that the dismissal was technical and not on merits. Considering that the dismissal was under Section 256 CrPC for default, leave to appeal was granted. The appeal was admitted and taken up for final hearing with consent. The court noted that the complainant had been diligent in seeking warrants and paying fees, and the absence on the date of dismissal was not deliberate. The court set aside the dismissal order and restored the complaint to its original number, directing the trial court to proceed with the matter on merits and dispose it expeditiously.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Dismissal for Default - Section 256 CrPC - Leave to Appeal - Order dismissing complaint under Section 138 NI Act for default under Section 256 CrPC is a technical dismissal not on merits - Leave to appeal granted to allow complainant to prosecute the matter on merits (Paras 2-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether leave to appeal should be granted against an order dismissing a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for default under Section 256 of the Code of Criminal Procedure due to absence of complainant and advocate.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Leave to appeal granted. Appeal admitted and taken up for final hearing. Impugned order set aside. Complaint restored to its original number. Trial court directed to proceed with the matter on merits and dispose it expeditiously.

Law Points

  • Leave to appeal granted against technical dismissal for default under Section 256 CrPC
  • complaint under Section 138 NI Act restored
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (09) 91

Criminal Application (APPA) No. 511 of 2011 in Criminal Appeal No. 444 of 2011

2011-09-20

U. V. Bakre, J.

Mr. Anup Dhore for applicant, Mr. R. M. Pande h/f Mr. S. P. Bhandarkar for respondent

Prakash s/o Budha Balbudhe

Dinesh s/o Baburao Madavi

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application for leave to appeal against dismissal of complaint under Section 138 NI Act for default under Section 256 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Leave to file appeal against order dated 7/6/2011 dismissing complaint for default

Filing Reason

Complaint under Section 138 NI Act dismissed due to absence of complainant and advocate on date of hearing

Previous Decisions

Complaint dismissed under Section 256 CrPC by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Arjuni (Morgaon) on 7/6/2011 in Misc. Criminal Case No. 547 of 2007

Issues

Whether leave to appeal should be granted against a technical dismissal for default under Section 256 CrPC

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that dismissal was not on merits but for default, and leave should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

An order dismissing a complaint under Section 256 CrPC for default is a technical dismissal not on merits, and leave to appeal should be granted to allow the complainant to prosecute the matter on merits.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned order, as argued by the learned Advocate for the applicant, is not on merit but is an order of dismissal for default. Considering that this is a technical dismissal under Section 256 Cri.P.C., leave to file appeal against the impugned order is granted.

Procedural History

Complaint filed under Sections 138 and 142 NI Act in 2007. Process issued. Accused appeared and furnished bail but later remained absent. Complainant sought bailable and non-bailable warrants. Case transferred to morning court. On 7/6/2011, complaint dismissed under Section 256 CrPC for absence of complainant and advocate. Applicant filed Criminal Application (APPA) No. 511 of 2011 for leave to appeal. High Court granted leave and admitted appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: 138, 142
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 256
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Six Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 302 read with 149 IPC set aside as sole reliance on interested witnesses and absence of independent c...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.