COMMERCIAL FIRST APPEAL NO. 23 OF 2025
7 Aug 2026The appellant, a partnership firm, filed a commercial suit for recovery of its claim amount after attempting pre-institution mediation. The appellant ...
Search Results for "Prospective Statute"
867 result(s) found
Found 867 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Enemy Property Tax Exemption Case — Property Tax Levyable on Lessee Despite Union Ownership. Article 285(2) of Constitution Enables Municipal Corporation to Impose Property Tax on Lessee of Union Property Even if Union Itself is Exempt Under Article 285(1).
22 Feb 2024The present civil appeal arises from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court which allowed a writ petition filed by the respondent-assessee, holding th...
- 186
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case on Unexplained Investment in Silver Bullion. Section 69A of Income Tax Act, 1961 Applicable Where Assessee Fails to Explain Source of Acquisition of Silver Found in Possession.
20 Sep 2022The present appeals were filed by the Revenue against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which allowed the appeals of the assessee, Prakash Chan...
- 248
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Sales Tax Attachment Over Bank's Secured Assets Under SARFAESI Act — Priority of Secured Creditor Upheld. Section 26E of SARFAESI Act gives priority to secured creditors over crown debts, and attachment by sales tax authorities cannot defeat the bank's security interest.
22 Jan 2024The petitioner, Union Bank of India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash an attachment order dated 2...
- 126
High Court
Bombay High Court Holds It Lacks Jurisdiction to Decide Amendment Application in Suit Slated for Transfer Due to Loss of Pecuniary Jurisdiction. The Court cannot retain jurisdiction to decide an amendment application seeking to increase suit valuation after the Bombay City Civil Court (Amendment) Act, 2023 came into force, as the suit already falls within the enhanced pecuniary jurisdiction of the City Civil Court.
23 Feb 2024The Bombay High Court was tasked with deciding whether it retains jurisdiction to entertain an application for amendment of plaint seeking to increase...
- 106
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Development Charges Demand on Nazul Land for TDR-Based Construction — No Legal Basis for Levy Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code or Nagpur Land Rules. The court held that the Nazul Tahsildar cannot demand development charges for NOC to sell flats constructed using TDR on nazul land as there is no statutory provision authorizing such levy.
1 Feb 2023The petitioner, Sunil Thapar, owner of nazul Plot No.94 in Ramdaspeth, Nagpur, entered into a development agreement with M/s Raghav Life Spaces on 22 ...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Secured Creditor's Priority Over Sales Tax Dues in MVAT Act Attachment Dispute. State Bank of India's mortgage charge on borrower's property held superior to VAT recovery under Section 32 of MVAT Act, 2002, following Central Bank of India v. State of Kerala ratio.
17 Dec 2020The State Bank of India (SBI), a secured creditor, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the attachment of a propert...
- 36
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Sales Tax Levy on Steam at 10% — Steam Not a Chemical Under BST Act, 1959. The court held that steam is not a chemical in common parlance and the burden of proof on the assessee was not discharged.
8 Apr 2010The applicant, M/s Gopalanand Rasayan, a manufacturer of sulphuric acid and other chemicals, generated steam as a byproduct during manufacturing and s...
- 151
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute Over Right of Way and Title. Suit for Injunction Dismissed and Counterclaim for Declaration of Title and Injunction Upheld Based on Adverse Possession and Better Title.
13 Aug 2010The appellants, Efigenio Dias and Josinho Dias, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondents, Malaquias D'Costa and others, to restra...
- 70
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Students' Petitions Challenging AICTE's Retrospective Reduction of Engineering Seats — Violation of Natural Justice and Legitimate Expectation. AICTE's power to regulate technical education does not include the power to retrospectively alter approved intake after admissions are finalized, as it violates principles of natural justice and legitimate expectation under Article 14 and Article 21 of the Constitution.
5 Jul 2019The petitioners, students who had taken admission to engineering colleges in Maharashtra for the academic year 2019-20, challenged the decision of the...
- 202
