Bombay High Court Upholds Sales Tax Levy on Steam at 10% — Steam Not a Chemical Under BST Act, 1959. The court held that steam is not a chemical in common parlance and the burden of proof on the assessee was not discharged.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, M/s Gopalanand Rasayan, a manufacturer of sulphuric acid and other chemicals, generated steam as a byproduct during manufacturing and sold it. The applicant classified steam as a chemical and collected sales tax at 4% under Entry No.233 of the notification issued under Section 41 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The Assessing Authority, however, held that steam was covered by Entry No.102 of Schedule C Part II, taxable at 10%, and assessed accordingly. The applicant's appeals were unsuccessful before the Tribunal, which rejected the contention that steam is a chemical. The Tribunal referred three questions of law to the High Court under Section 61(1) of the BST Act, 1959. The High Court, after hearing the parties, held that the common parlance test applies for classification of goods under sales tax. Steam, being water in gaseous form, is not understood as a chemical in common parlance. The burden of proof was on the applicant to show that steam falls under the chemical entry, which they failed to discharge. The court answered both questions in the affirmative, against the applicant, and upheld the levy of sales tax at 10%.

Headnote

A) Sales Tax - Classification of Goods - Common Parlance Test - Steam as Chemical - Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, Section 41, Entry No.233 - The issue was whether steam is a chemical taxable at 4% under Entry No.233 or a general good taxable at 10% under Entry No.102 of Schedule C Part II. The court held that steam is not a chemical in common parlance and the burden of proof lies on the assessee to show that the goods fall under a specific entry. The Tribunal's rejection of the applicant's contention was upheld. (Paras 1-5)

B) Sales Tax - Burden of Proof - Classification of Goods - Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - The court held that the burden is on the assessee to prove that the goods are covered by a specific exemption or lower rate entry. The applicant failed to discharge this burden. (Para 5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether steam is a chemical under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 and exigible to sales tax at 4% or 10%

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both questions answered in the affirmative, against the applicant. The levy of sales tax at 10% on steam is upheld.

Law Points

  • Common parlance test
  • classification of goods under sales tax
  • burden of proof on assessee
  • interpretation of exemption notifications
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (04) 77

Sales Tax Reference No.5 of 2001, Sales Tax Reference No.12 of 2003, Sales Tax Reference No.59 of 2008

2010-04-08

V.C. Daga, K.K. Tated

Mr. P.C. Joshi for Applicant, Mr. V.A. Sonpal for Respondents

M/s Gopalanand Rasayan

The State of Maharashtra and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Sales tax reference under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959

Remedy Sought

Opinion of the High Court on whether steam is a chemical taxable at 4%

Filing Reason

Dispute over classification of steam for sales tax purposes

Previous Decisions

Assessing Authority held steam taxable at 10% under Entry No.102; Tribunal rejected applicant's contention

Issues

Whether steam is a chemical under the BST Act, 1959 and taxable at 4% Whether the Tribunal was justified in placing burden on applicant to prove steam is a chemical

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued steam is a chemical and taxable at 4% under Entry No.233 Respondent argued steam is not a chemical and taxable at 10% under Entry No.102

Ratio Decidendi

Steam is not a chemical in common parlance; the burden of proof is on the assessee to show that goods fall under a specific entry; the applicant failed to discharge that burden.

Judgment Excerpts

Whether on the facts and evidence on record the Tribunal was justified in law in rejecting the contention of the Applicants that the steam was a chemical and hence, sales thereof were exigible to sales tax @ 4% only? Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in throwing the burden on the Applicants to prove that the steam was a chemical as understood in common parlance and thereby, confirming the levy of sales tax on its sales @ 10%?

Procedural History

Assessing Authority assessed steam at 10%; applicant appealed to Tribunal which rejected contention; Tribunal referred questions to High Court under Section 61(1) of BST Act, 1959.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959: Section 41, Section 61(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Sales Tax Levy on Steam at 10% — Steam Not a Chemical Under BST Act, 1959. The court held that steam is not a chemical in common parlance and the burden of proof on the assessee was not discharged.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Appointment of Commissioner in Civil Suit — Appointment Would Amount to Calling Evidence at Instance of Court. The court held that under Order 26 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, a Commissioner cannot...