Search Results for "MACT claim"

738 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 738 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeal and Remands Motor Accident Claim for Computation of Compensation, Holding That Delay in FIR Is Not Fatal and Test Is Preponderance of Probabilities. Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim for Discrepancies in Vehicle Number Despite Corroborating Evidence of MLC and Spot Panchnama.

The appellant, Dilip Deshmukh, suffered grievous head injuries in a motor accident on 20 May 2011 while riding his motorcycle, when a Trax jeep collid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation for Grievous Injuries in Motor Accident Claim — Tribunal's Award of Rs.47,592/- Enhanced to Rs.1,00,000/- Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Claimant's Medical Expenses and Pain and Suffering Considered for Just Compensation.

The appellant, Solanki Dipakbhai Babubhai, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation of Rs.2,00,0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Hears Appeal by Insurance Company Against Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Award in Fatal Accident Case. Deceased Motorcyclist Died After Braking to Avoid Dog; Insurance Company Contends Claim Not Maintainable Due to Own Negligence.

The case involved an appeal by the National Insurance Company against the award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Perambalur, in M.C.O.P.N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Police Constable's Knee Injury. Tribunal's finding of negligence and quantum of compensation affirmed as no grounds for interference under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by D. Ramesh, a police constable, who sustained a knee injury when his motorcycle was hit by a Marut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Rejection by Tribunal — Involvement of Vehicle and Negligence Established. Tribunal Failed to Decide Quantum of Compensation, Leading to Remand.

The appellants, the widow and minor sons of Nilesh Arlekar, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation for his dea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Interim Compensation Under Section 140 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — No-Fault Liability Principle Applied. Tribunal's Order to Hear Application on Merits Set Aside as Premature; Interim Compensation Directed to Be Paid Within Four Weeks.

The petitioner, Meenakshi @ Meena Ashok Jondhale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the Motor Accident Claims...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Vehicle Accident Claim — Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim for Damages to Car. Owner of Vehicle is Competent to Maintain Claim Petition Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Even if Not the Registered Owner.

The appellant, Sri Hemanth Raju, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, ...