WRIT PETITION NO.9189 of 2010
5 May 2011The matter arose out of a dispute over the setting up of a new private sugar factory. Khandoba Prasanna Sakhar Karkhana Limited and Sahyadri Sahakari ...
Search Results for "Delhi Development Authority"
3181 result(s) found
Found 3181 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Directs High-Level Committee to Oversee Restoration of Polluted Rivers in Rajasthan, Recognizing Constitutional Right to Healthy Environment. Severe Contamination of Jojari, Bandi and Luni Rivers from Industrial and Sewage Discharges Found to Violate Right to Life Under Article 21, Necessitating Immediate Judicial Intervention.
1 Jan 1970The Supreme Court took suo moto cognizance of a news documentary exposing severe pollution in the Jojari, Bandi and Luni rivers of Rajasthan, endanger...
- 41
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Disposes of Contempt Petitions for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Orders Directing Issuance of TDR for Land Acquired for Road Widening — Compliance Found, Delay Apologized. The Court held that the respondents had substantially complied with the orders and the delay was not intentional, accepting unconditional apology.
13 Dec 2024The judgment concerns multiple contempt petitions filed by landowners whose land was acquired for widening of Bellary and Jayamahal Roads in Bengaluru...
- 407
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeal by Original Owners and Subsequent Purchasers — Holders Have No Locus as Land Vested in Government After Final Notification Under City of Mysore Improvement Act, 1903; Sale During Pendency of Challenge Rendered Ineffective
28 Jul 2026Background: The case involved a land acquisition challenge under the City of Mysore Improvement Act, 1903, initiated in 1981 for the formation of Vija...
- 23
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Foreign Trade Act Case Due to Lack of Sanction. Proceedings Initiated Without Mandatory Sanction Under Section 61 of the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992 Are Void Ab Initio.
3 Apr 2013The petitioner, N. Mruthunjaya @ Muthu, was the accused in four criminal cases (C.C. Nos. 1221/2003, 1222/2003, 1223/2003, and 1224/2003) pending befo...
- 52
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Directs BDA to Allot Alternate Site to Purchaser After Original Site Acquired for Road Widening. The court held that the BDA's action of taking over the site without notice was arbitrary and violative of natural justice, and directed allotment of an alternate site from available vacant sites.
28 Mar 2013The petitioner, Smt. N. Dhakshayini, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the responde...
- 81
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Directs BDA to Allot Alternate Site to Purchaser After Original Site Acquired for Road Widening — Petitioner Entitled to Alternate Site at Same Price as Original Allotment
28 Mar 2013The petitioner, Smt. N. Dhakshayini, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the responde...
- 80
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BDA Appeals in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Acquisition for J.P. Nagar Layout Declared Lapsed. Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 mandates award within two years of final notification; failure results in lapse of proceedings.
17 Oct 2017The case involves two writ appeals filed by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) and the Special Land Acquisition Officer against an order dated ...
- 134
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Housing Board Against High Court Order Directing Arbitration Tribunal to Entertain Fresh Claim Despite Prior Arbitral Award. Principle of Issue Estoppel and Finality of Award Under Arbitration Act, 1996 Applied.
26 Oct 2021The case involves three civil appeals by the Madhya Pradesh Housing and Infrastructure Development Board against a common judgment of the Madhya Prade...
- 210
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Upholds Single Judge's Refusal of Ad-Interim Relief. Court holds that a developer cannot claim exclusive right to implement a slum rehabilitation scheme when there is a rival claim by another developer and the slum dwellers' association has the right to choose the developer.
7 May 2011The appellant, M/s Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., filed two appeals against the judgment and order dated 5th April 2011 passed by the learned S...
- 55
