Search Results for "stick assault"

650 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 650 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 304-I IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Support Homicidal Strangulation and Witnesses Turned Hostile.

The appellants, Shobhelal, Pruthviraj, and Munna, were convicted by the Sessions Court, Bhandara, under Section 304-I read with Section 34 IPC for the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Recovery — State fails to prove guilt under Sections 395 and 397 IPC as witnesses could not identify accused and no stolen property recovered.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 16.02.2004 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kelapur, in Sessions Trial...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Fatal Assault Case — Life Sentence Confirmed for Appellant Under Section 302 IPC. Evidence of Eye-Witnesses and Medical Reports Establish Intent to Cause Death in Group Attack with Sticks and Stones.

The appellant, Suman Vishal Himansu, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Silvassa in Sessions Case No.9/2012 for offences und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder in Single Blow Case. Appellant convicted under Section 304 Part I IPC for causing death by a single blow on the head, sentence of ten years rigorous imprisonment confirmed.

The appellant, Mahesh Rajaram Gondare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Case No. 263 of 2017 for the offence under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 IPC, Upholds Life Imprisonment. Child Witness Testimony and Seizure of Axe Under Section 27 Evidence Act Formed Reliable Basis for Conviction.

The present appeal arose from a judgment and order dated 30.10.2009 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule in Sessions Case No.15 of 2009, con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 IPC for Murder by Setting Wife on Fire. Inconsistent Dying Declarations and Suicide Defense Raised.

The appeal arose from the judgment dated 16 May 2013 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, in Sessions Case No. 235 of 2011, convicting the ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Appeal from Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Trial Court Had Convicted Accused for Murder and Destruction of Evidence After Establishing Deceased's Identity Through DNA Test.

The appeal arises from the conviction of the appellant by the I Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Shimoga, in S.C. No.95/2012 for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 88 OF 2000

The appeal arose from the judgment of the Sessions Court, Beed, which convicted the appellant for offences under Sections 393/34, 324, and 353 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Dying Declarations in Bride Burning Case. Dying declarations found credible despite minor discrepancies; conviction under Section 302 IPC confirmed.

The appellant, Rajendra Ramdas Kolhe, was convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for the murder of his wife Rekha, a police constable. T...