High Court of Karnataka Considers Appeal from Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Trial Court Had Convicted Accused for Murder and Destruction of Evidence After Establishing Deceased's Identity Through DNA Test.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arises from the conviction of the appellant by the I Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Shimoga, in S.C. No.95/2012 for offences under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The prosecution case, as narrated in column No.17, was that the deceased had an illicit relationship with the accused for about 12 years. In the last 5 to 6 months, the accused suspected her of infidelity and, on 02.03.2012, between 5.30 p.m. and 6.30 p.m., he took her to a eucalyptus grove in survey number 90 of Baluru Village, Shikaripura Taluk, where he hit her on the head with a stone and then pressed her neck, causing her death. He then removed the SIM card from her mobile phone, took the handset and some jewellery, and handed them to his wife to destroy evidence. The body was discovered in a decomposed state on 10.03.2012 by a police constable who had gone to the spot to verify a report of gambling. The investigation led to the arrest of the accused on 16.03.2012, and recoveries were made based on his voluntary statement. The identity of the deceased was established through a DNA test matching samples from her mother and son. The trial court accepted the prosecution case and convicted the appellant, sentencing him to life imprisonment. The appellant filed the present appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to set aside the conviction. The High Court heard the appeal, with the appellant represented by Sri M. Shashidhara and the State by the High Court Government Pleader. The judgment delivered on 08.10.2021 by a division bench comprising Justice G. Narendar and Justice M.I. Arun discusses the evidence of witnesses PW-1 and PW-2, the discovery of the body, and the circumstances relied upon by the prosecution. However, the provided text does not include the final decision or reasoning of the court.

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010260962016_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (KAR) (10) 11

Criminal Appeal No.639/2016

2021-10-08

G. Narendar, M.I. Arun

M. Shashidhara, K. Nageshwarappa

B.M. Manjunatha @ Manjappa Nagavanda

The State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder and destruction of evidence.

Remedy Sought

Appellant/accused seeking to set aside the judgment of conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court.

Filing Reason

Conviction by the trial court for offences under Sections 302 and 201 IPC; appellant alleges wrongful conviction.

Previous Decisions

Trial court (I Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Shimoga) convicted appellant in S.C. No.95/2012 on 04.02.2016 and sentenced on 08.02.2016.

Judgment Excerpts

the appellant/accused took the said Chandrakala to the land bearing Sy.No.90 situated in Baluru Village of Shikaripura Taluk on 02.03.2012 and between 05.30 p.m. and 06.30 p.m., he committed the murder by striking on the head of the said Chandrakala with a stone found in the land and upon the deceased losing consciousness and falling to the ground, the accused proceeded to press her neck and thereby asphyxiated her and committed the murder the body was highly decomposed and the Investigating Officer in order to establish the identity of the deceased, requested the jurisdictional Court to permit conduct of DNA test with the blood samples of the mother of the deceased and her son

Procedural History

Investigation led to charge sheet; trial court convicted; appellant filed appeal under Section 374(2) CrPC before High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 201
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 374(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Considers Appeal from Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Trial Court Had Convicted Accused for Murder and Destruction of Evidence After Establishing Deceased's Identity Through DNA Test...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petitions Challenging CAT Directions on Promotion to General Manager (Open Line) — Employer's Delay and Contradictory Stand Negate Requirement of DRM Experience. Court Holds That Under Indian Railway Est...