Search Results for "oral inquiry not required"

2776 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2776 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Notice of Motion in Suit Challenging Suspension of Jockey by Turf Club; Challenge Based on Unreasoned Order. Domestic Tribunal Must Give Reasons for Its Decisions, Especially When Affecting Livelihood, Argues Plaintiff.

The plaintiff, a jockey with over 20 years of experience, filed a suit and notice of motion challenging the order of the Board of Appeal of the Royal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Backwages in Industrial Dispute — Employer's Challenge Dismissed for Lack of Merit. Termination of Workman Found Illegal as Domestic Inquiry Was Not Held and Employer Failed to Prove Misconduct.

The petitioner, M/s TTK Healthcare Ltd, an employer engaged in the manufacture of ready-to-eat food products, challenged the award dated 28.02.2014 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Bail Petitions and Refers Questions on POCSO Act to Division Bench. Single Judge observes conflicting views on Section 35 compliance and refers issues regarding default bail and evidence recording under Section 164 Cr.P.C., doubting Vinay v. State of Karnataka.

The case involved two criminal petitions filed before the Karnataka High Court by the accused, Hanumantha Mogaveera, seeking bail under Section 439 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Copyright Groundless Threat Suit. Suit Under Section 60 of Copyright Act, 1957 Not Barred by Prior FIR and Subsequent Suit if Filed Without Due Diligence.

The dispute arose from a commercial conflict over software copyright. The appellant developed a software for tax professionals, launched in 2007. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Convicts Directors for Default in Filing Statement of Affairs Under Section 454(5) of Companies Act, 1956 — Failure to Submit Statement Despite Repeated Court Orders and Notices Constitutes Offence Without Reasonable Excuse.

The Official Liquidator of M/s. Geeta Marine Services Pvt. Ltd. filed a complaint under Section 454(5) of the Companies Act, 1956 against four accused...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating ST Certificate for Lack of Affinity Test. Caste Claim as 'Thakur' (ST) Upheld as Contemporaneous Documentary Evidence Outweighs Affinity Test Under Maharashtra Act XXIII of 2001.

The petitioner, Monika Sunil Shinde, a 19-year-old resident of Ahmednagar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challe...