Search Results for "minority members"

631 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 631 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules on Automatic Stay of Arbitral Awards Under Section 26 of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015. The Mere Filing of a Section 34 Petition Does Not Trigger Automatic Stay; Award-Holder Can Execute Unless Stay Granted.

The snippet of the judgment deals with Chamber Summonses in Execution Applications arising from an arbitral award. The dispute involves Enercon GmbH a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Blanket Prohibitory Order Under Section 144 CrPC in Bengaluru, Holds It Violative of Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b); Order Cancelling Protest Permissions Against CAA Struck Down as District Magistrate Failed to Apply Mind and Provide Material Facts.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions challenging an order dated 18 December 2019 issued by the District Magistrate-cum-Commissi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MUDA Allotment of Civic Amenities Site. Allotment to Second Respondent Upheld as Decision-Making Process Found Free from Illegality, Irrationality, or Procedural Impropriety.

The dispute arose from the allotment of a civic amenity site by the Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA). Pursuant to a public notification dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator; Validity of 20% Claim Cap Clause Under Scrutiny. The Court Examines Whether a Contractual Condition Limiting Arbitration to Claims Not Exceeding 20% of Contract Value Is Arbitrary and Discriminatory.

The dispute arose from a contract dated 7 May 2018 between a contractor and the Central Railways for the preparation of design and structural drawings...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeals Against Conviction for Rape and Murder and State\u2019s Appeals for Enhancement and Against Acquittal. Court Considers Circumstantial Evidence Linking Accused to Offences Under Sections 302, 376, 392, 201, 411, 414 IPC and Others.

Criminal Appeal No. 516 of 2012 was filed by accused Jawedkhan @ Tingrya against his conviction and sentence. Criminal Appeal No. 281 of 2012 and Crim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of Minor Girl, Dismisses Appeal. Verdict Affirms Trial Court's Death Penalty for Offences Under IPC Sections 302 and 376(2)(f) Based on Circumstantial Evidence.

The confirmation case and criminal appeal arose from the brutal rape and murder of a seven-year-old girl. The victim was the daughter of PW-1 Sharda, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reviews Death Sentence Reference in Gang Rape and Murder Case. Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence of Last Seen Together and Forcible Abduction from House of Victim's Uncle.

The matter arises from a reference made by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for confi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Confirmation Case and Criminal Appeals from Trial Court's Death Sentence for Rape-Murder of Minor. Court Analyses Circumstantial Evidence and Extra-Judicial Confession Under Sections 6, 7, 8 of Evidence Act; Conviction Based on Credible Testimony of Key Witnesses.

The case emanated from a heinous incident dated 22-08-2014 where a 16-year-old schoolgirl was raped and murdered near Hanumanwadi, Parner, Ahmednagar....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Reference for Confirmation of Death Sentence Under Section 366 CrPC and Criminal Appeal Against Conviction. The Trial Court Convicted the Accused Under Sections 302, 307, 323 Indian Penal Code and Awarded Death Sentence.

The matter came before the Bombay High Court as a confirmation reference under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and a criminal app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Disposes of Two Public Interest Litigations Challenging Joint Venture Agreement for Transfer of 20 Acres of Land at Film City, Goregaon. The Court Decided the Common Challenge to the Agreement in Both Petitions, Leaving Other Reliefs for Separate Adjudication.

The High Court of Bombay heard two public interest litigations filed by different sets of petitioners, both challenging the actions of the Maharashtra...