Search Results for "member dispute"

6353 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6353 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Restraining Transfer of Employees in Print Media Company. Transfer of Senior Printers to Other Locations Held Not an Unfair Labour Practice Under Items 9 and 10 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioners, The Indian Express (P) Limited and its two officers, challenged an order dated 28 November 2022 passed by the learned Member, Industr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish the common object and individual overt acts beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves multiple criminal appeals filed by the appellants against their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Client Against Trading Member for Unauthorized Trades. Award of Rs.6,59,634.54 with interest upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Angel Broking Private Limited, a trading member, challenged an arbitral award dated 29 August 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator appoint...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Preliminary Objections in Writ Petition on Standing Committee Term Expiry under Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949. Acquiescence Rejected on Ground that There is No Estoppel Against Law; Laches Not Applicable as Issue Raised Continuing Cause of Action.

The writ petition was filed by Prashant Prabhakar More, an elected Councilor of the Nashik Municipal Corporation, under Article 226 of the Constitutio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Notice Signed by Majority of Total Members of Grampanchayat is Valid Under Section 55(2) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Shivkant Bangar and Gavlan Tekale challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gr...