Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Petition Challenging Disqualification Proceedings Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Collector Directed to Frame Preliminary Issue on Maintainability. The court held that the Collector must decide the preliminary issue of maintainability before proceeding with disqualification proceedings, especially when a Supreme Court precedent is cited.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Shaikh Wahed Yakub, was elected as a member of Village Panchayat Chitegaon and subsequently became its Sarpanch in June 2021. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 filed a dispute before the Collector, Aurangabad, under Sections 14(j-3) and 16 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, seeking his disqualification on the ground that he had made encroachment over government land. The specific grievance was that a complaint by one Shaikh Akbar Miya on 14/02/2019 alleged that the petitioner had constructed on a drainage line where a common toilet was to be built. A report dated 29.05.2019 declared the petitioner had made encroachment, and the Block Development Officer on 26.03.2019 directed removal of the encroachment. The petitioner appeared before the Collector and requested framing of a preliminary issue on maintainability, citing the Supreme Court judgment in State of Himachal Pradesh and others Vs. Surinder Singh Banolta. The Collector, however, rejected the request and proceeded with the matter. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition. The court heard the parties and observed that the Collector should have framed a preliminary issue on maintainability, especially when the petitioner relied on a Supreme Court judgment. The court directed the Collector to frame and decide the preliminary issue within four weeks, and stayed further proceedings until then. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Panchayat Law - Disqualification Proceedings - Maintainability - Preliminary Issue - Sections 14(j-3), 16, Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 - The petitioner, elected Sarpanch, challenged the maintainability of disqualification proceedings initiated by respondents alleging encroachment on government land. The court held that the Collector ought to have framed a preliminary issue on maintainability, especially when the petitioner relied on a Supreme Court judgment. The court directed the Collector to decide the preliminary issue within four weeks. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Collector should have framed a preliminary issue regarding the maintainability of the disqualification proceedings before proceeding further.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The order of the Collector dated 16.12.2021 is set aside. The Collector is directed to frame a preliminary issue regarding maintainability and decide it within four weeks. Further proceedings in the disqualification matter are stayed until then.

Law Points

  • Maintainability of disqualification proceedings
  • Preliminary issue framing
  • Section 14(j-3) and Section 16 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act
  • 1959
  • Encroachment as disqualification ground
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (01) 17

WRIT PETITION NO.14889 OF 2021

2022-01-25

BHARATI H. DANGRE

Mr.Y.V.Kakde for petitioner, Mr.P.G.Borade AGP for respondent No.1, Mr.R.V.Gore for respondent No.2

Shaikh Wahed Yakub

The Collector, Aurangabad; Krushna Sukhdeo Gidhane; Sayyed Habib Imam

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of the Collector refusing to frame a preliminary issue on maintainability of disqualification proceedings.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the Collector's order and direction to frame preliminary issue on maintainability.

Filing Reason

The Collector refused to frame a preliminary issue on maintainability despite the petitioner citing a Supreme Court judgment.

Previous Decisions

The Collector passed an order on 16.12.2021 rejecting the request for preliminary issue.

Issues

Whether the Collector should have framed a preliminary issue on maintainability of the disqualification proceedings.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the proceedings are not maintainable in view of the Supreme Court judgment in State of Himachal Pradesh and others Vs. Surinder Singh Banolta. Respondents opposed the request for preliminary issue.

Ratio Decidendi

The Collector must frame and decide a preliminary issue on maintainability when raised by a party, especially when a Supreme Court precedent is cited, before proceeding with the merits of the disqualification case.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner appeared before the Collector and requested for framing a preliminary point for consideration about the maintainability of the proceedings in view of the reported judgment of the Apex Court in State of Himachal Pradesh and others Vs. Surinder Singh Banolta [AIR 2007 SCW 602]. The Collector ought to have framed a preliminary issue about the maintainability of the proceedings.

Procedural History

The petitioner was elected Sarpanch in June 2021. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 filed a disqualification petition before the Collector under Sections 14(j-3) and 16 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. The petitioner appeared and requested framing of a preliminary issue on maintainability. The Collector rejected the request on 16.12.2021. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition on an unspecified date. The High Court heard the matter and pronounced judgment on 25.01.2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959: 14(j-3), 16, 52, 53
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Petition Challenging Disqualification Proceedings Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Collector Directed to Frame Preliminary Issue on Maintainability. The court held that the Collector must decide the pre...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholding High Court's Decision on Share Entitlement and Appellate Jurisdiction. The court held that in a partition suit, parties' positions are interchangeable, allowing appellate relief to non-appea...