Search Results for "issues"

14696 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 14696 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Procedural Order in Arbitration Proceeding. Section 9 or Section 19 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Cannot Be Invoked to Challenge Arbitrator's Communication Regarding Procedure.

The petitioner, Sahyadri Earthmovers, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 9 read with Section 19 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitration Award Against Guarantors in Cooperative Bank Dispute — Guarantors Not Liable for Enhanced Credit Facility Without Their Consent. Guarantor Liability Cannot Be Extended Beyond Original Guarantee Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common undated arb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Upholds Award as Not Suffering from Patent Illegality or Being Against Public Policy, Refusing to Reappreciate Evidence.

The petitioner, Angel Capital & Debt Market Limited, a stock broker, challenged an arbitral award dated 16 May 2009 under Section 34 of the Arbitratio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows School Management's Petition Against School Tribunal Order in Service Dispute. Caste Validity Challenge by Management Not Barred by Limitation Under Section 9 of MEPS Act, 1977.

The petitioners, Maharashtra Vidya Prasarak Mandal Khamgaon and the Head Master of Maharashtra Vidyalaya, Janori, filed a writ petition challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs State of Goa to Notify SOTTO and Implement Organ Transplant Rules Under Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994. The court held that failure to notify SOTTO and create transparent waiting lists violates the Act and Rules, affecting the right to health of patients.

The Bombay High Court at Goa disposed of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by The Mango Foundation (TMF), a registered non-profit organization,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Loan Dispute. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Due to Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator.

The applicant, Mangal Credit and Fincorp Limited, a public limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed an application under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs State of Goa to Notify SOTTO and Implement Organ Transplant Rules Under Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994. Court Orders Creation of Transparent Waiting Lists, Retrieval Teams, and Dedicated Website for Organ Transplantation in Public Interest.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by The Mango Foundation, a registered non-profit organization, seeking enforcement of the Transplantation of...