Search Results for "interlocutory jurisdiction"

1698 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1698 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Human Rights Commission Order Against Police Officers for Alleged Illegal Detention and Assault — Commission Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 18 of Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.

The petitioners, three police officers, challenged the order dated 8.5.2012 passed by the Karnataka State Human Rights Commission in HRC.R.P No.1/08 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Non-Signatories Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act. Third Parties Cannot Appeal Interim Arbitral Orders Absent Privity of Arbitration Agreement.

The dispute arose from arbitration proceedings between Excel Metal Processors Pvt. Ltd. (respondent no.1) and Shakti International Private Limited (re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Cooperative Society Redevelopment Case on Jurisdiction and Limitation Grounds. Civil Court Maintainability Upheld Under Section 91 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and Suit Found Within Limitation with Possible Section 14 Benefit.

The dispute arose from a redevelopment project involving a Cooperative Society registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Caveat in Execution Proceedings — Caveat Under Section 148A CPC Not Maintainable After Execution Application Is Filed. Court Holds That Assignee Decree-Holder Can Execute Decree Without Notice to Judgment-Debtor Under Order 21 Rule 16 CPC.

The petitioners, who are judgment-debtors in a pending execution application, filed a caveat under Section 148A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court Order Quashing Recovery of Excess Salary Paid Due to Employer's Mistake. Recovery of Rs.1,94,637/- from Retired Employee Set Aside as Employer's Inadvertence Cannot Be Visited on Employee.

The respondent, Sou. Anjali Anil Tare, was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk (LDC) in 1977 and passed her lower division grade examination in 1980, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Disposes of Miscellaneous Application in PIL on Elephant Welfare, Extending High Powered Committee Jurisdiction Pan-India. Court Declined Clarification on Earlier Order, Instead Modified Committee Scope to Cover All States for Wild Animal Transfer and Rehabilitation Issues.

The dispute originated from a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed in the Karnataka High Court, where the petitioner sought directions to restrict t...