Case Note & Summary
The petitioners, three police officers, challenged the order dated 8.5.2012 passed by the Karnataka State Human Rights Commission in HRC.R.P No.1/08 and HRC.No.856/08, whereby the Commission directed them to pay compensation of Rs. 50,000 each to respondent No.1 for alleged illegal detention and assault. The petitioners contended that the Commission had no jurisdiction to pass such an order without affording them an opportunity of hearing and that the Commission exceeded its powers under Section 18 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993. The High Court examined the scope of the Commission's powers and held that while the Commission can make recommendations, it cannot pass a final order directing payment of compensation without hearing the affected parties. The court quashed the impugned orders, observing that the Commission acted without jurisdiction and in violation of principles of natural justice.
Headnote
A) Human Rights Commission - Jurisdiction - Section 18 of Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 - The Commission while making a recommendation under Section 18 cannot pass a final order directing payment of compensation without giving an opportunity of hearing to the persons likely to be affected - Held that the Commission's order directing payment of compensation to the complainant without hearing the police officers was without jurisdiction and in violation of principles of natural justice (Paras 1-10). B) Human Rights Commission - Inquiry - Section 17 of Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 - The Commission has powers of a civil court for inquiry but cannot adjudicate disputed questions of fact or award compensation without proper evidence and hearing - Held that the Commission's order was beyond its scope as it acted as a trial court (Paras 1-10).
Issue of Consideration
Whether the Karnataka State Human Rights Commission had the jurisdiction to pass an order directing payment of compensation to the complainant without affording an opportunity of hearing to the police officers and whether the Commission exceeded its powers under Section 18 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.
Final Decision
The High Court allowed the writ petition and quashed the impugned orders dated 8.5.2012 and 3.7.2008 passed by the Karnataka State Human Rights Commission.
Law Points
- Jurisdiction of Human Rights Commission
- Scope of Section 18 of Protection of Human Rights Act
- 1993
- Power to award compensation
- Requirement of opportunity of hearing
- Distinction between inquiry and adjudication
