Search Results for "declaration under Section 126"

808 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 808 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance Due to Non-Compliance with Order VI Rule 17 CPC and Lack of Pleading Readiness and Willingness. Plaintiff failed to amend plaint to incorporate essential facts regarding readiness and willingness to perform contract, leading to dismissal of suit.

The plaintiff, Neeta Sawant, filed a suit for specific performance of an Agreement for Sale dated 30th September 2016, by which the defendants agreed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Appeals in Encroachment Dispute, Holding Civil Court Lacks Jurisdiction. Shopkeepers' Suits for Declaration of Title and Injunction Dismissed as Property Vested in Corporation Under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and its Assistant Municipal Commissioner filed appeals against an interim order passed by the City Civil C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Mandamus Directing Authorities to Notify Lapsing of Land Reservation Under MRTP Act. Failure to Acquire Land Within Statutory Period Results in Automatic Deemed Release of Land from Reservation, and No Court Declaration is Required.

The petitioner, Sakharam Mahadev Jadhav (since deceased, represented by his legal heir Kailash Sakharam Jadhav), owned agricultural land in Village Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Railway Laundry Contract. Petition Questions Recovery Rate for Lost Linen, Delay Penalty, Penalty Cap, and Fixed Cost Compensation Under the Arbitration Act, 1996.

The Central Railway filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 7 March 2024 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11(6) Application and Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Property Sale Dispute. Arbitration clauses in MOU and Agreement for Sale held prima facie valid, and dispute referred to arbitration despite respondent's objection regarding non-signing of agreement.

The applicant, Bhupinder Singh Balwant Singh, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Partition Suit for Coparcenary Property Based on Pre-1956 Female Succession. Widow's acquisition of property under Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, 1937 is not a coparcenary asset but her absolute estate under Section 14(1) of Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 28.08.2019 in O.S. No. 101/2015 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Bagalkot, partl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Last Seen Evidence and Weak Motive. Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302, 120-B, 34 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Dnyaneshwar Yeshwant Mutalik (Respondent No.1) and three others in Sessions Case No.202 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reviews Appeals from Single Judge's Interim Orders in Share Control Dispute. Appeals Concern Enforcement of Arbitral Award, Injunctions, and Corporate Governance Interim Measures.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard four appeals arising from a common order dated 26-03-2003 passed by a Single Judge in two suits concernin...