Search Results for "criminal trial standard"

1858 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1858 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by CRPF Against Reinstatement of Constable Who Suppressed Criminal Antecedents. Termination Upheld as Respondent Willfully Concealed Pending Cases and Submitted Forged Documents.

The case involves an appeal by the Director General of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) and others against a judgment of the Gauhati High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Allegations.

The appellant, Maroti s/o Domaji Sadmake, was convicted by the trial court under Section 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for allegedly raping a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition for Interim Injunction in Media Rights Dispute; Allegations of Fraud and Collusion Cast Doubt on Validity of Agreements. Petitioner Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case for Relief Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case arose from a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by World Sport Group (India) Pvt. Ltd. against the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Lack of Instigation Evidence. Conviction under Section 306 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove active abetment, but conviction under Section 498A IPC for cruelty upheld based on deceased's dying declaration.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of three accused (husband, father-in-law, and mother-in-law) for offences under Sections 306 and 49...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows AERA's Appeal Against TDSAT Orders Under Section 31 of AERA Act — Tariff Determination Held to Be Regulatory, Not Adjudicatory, Function. Regulatory Authority Can Challenge Appellate Tribunal's Decisions on Questions of Law.

The Supreme Court of India addressed a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of appeals filed by the Airports Economic Regulatory Author...