Search Results for "corporate body"

1193 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1193 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order on Unfair Labour Practice. Failure to Provide Alternate Employment to Medically Unfit Driver Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Nagpur, which declared that the Corporation was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Eviction Petition by Airports Authority Against Licensee in Public Premises Act Case. Licence Expired by Efflux of Time, Occupant Becomes Unauthorised Under Section 2(g) of Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Airports Authority of India, a body corporate constituted under the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, challenged an order dated 8...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court holds that arbitrators are not bound to give reasons for each item of claim and that the award is not liable to be set aside for non-speaking nature under the Arbitration Act, 1940.

The appellant, Board of Trustees of Port of Mormugao, a body corporate under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, entered into a contract dated 12/10/1985...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Interest on Delayed Gratuity Payment Under Section 7(3A) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Service Regulations Cannot Override Statutory Mandate for Interest on Delayed Gratuity.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Allahabad Bank, a body corporate constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Directors and Company in Food Adulteration Matter Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Failure to Show That Accused Were In Charge of and Responsible for Business Conduct at Time of Offence Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The applicants, who were directors and a company (Marico Industries Ltd.), filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1...