Search Results for "advisory jurisdiction"

760 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 760 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order — Agricultural Land Acquired Prior to Detention Exempt from Forfeiture. Property acquired before the 'illegal' period under Section 2(2)(b) of SAFEMA cannot be forfeited; appellate authority's order partly confirmed.

The petitioner, Ranchhodbhai Bhagwanbhai Tandel (since deceased, through his legal heir Naresh Ranchhodbhai Tandel), filed a criminal writ petition un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restricts Provisional Attachment to Disputed Amount in MVAT Act Case — Section 48(5) Constitutional Challenge Rejected. Court holds that attachment under Section 35 must be proportionate, and directs respondents to limit attachment to Rs.1.81 crores.

The petitioner, M/s. Premium Paper and Board Industries Ltd., a registered dealer under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act) and the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Electricity Disconnection of Sick Industrial Company. Government's Communication to MSEDCL to Disconnect Supply Set Aside as Violative of Natural Justice and Contrary to BIFR Directions.

The petitioner, Goradia Special Steels Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956, is a sick industrial company registered with the Boa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Time Bound Promotion of Bailiff in Subordinate Court. Petitioner denied assured promotional scale despite completing 12 years of service as per Government Resolution.

The petitioner, Shrirang Atmaram Nikam, was appointed as a Bailiff in the subordinate court on 17th April 1989 and was confirmed subsequently. He clai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Life Convict Seeking Premature Release — State's Order Requiring 26 Years Imprisonment Set Aside. Court holds that Government Resolution dated 15th March 2010 requires specific finding of exceptional violence to deny premature release after 14 years.

The petitioner, Santosh @ Sonu Balram Jadhav, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment on 21st July...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Under MPDA Act — Activities Relate to Law and Order, Not Public Order. Personal Dispute Between Co-Residents Does Not Affect Public Order Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

The petitioner, mother of the detenu Asif Abdul Ahad Shaikh, challenged a detention order dated 30 July 2005 passed under the Maharashtra Prevention o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay. Unexplained Delay of Over Two Months Between In-Camera Statements and Detention Order Breaks Live Link, Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu, challenged the detention order dated 7th July 2005 passed under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement and Back Wages for Employee Terminated Without Notice in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer's Failure to Prove Abandonment of Service and Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Renders Termination Illegal.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Goodlass Nerolac Paints Limited under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an award of the ...