Search Results for "Larger Bench"

3958 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3958 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Writ Petition Involving Parking Amenity Dispute Under Article 226. Court Finds That Alteration of Parking Amenity Raises Public Law Concerns Requiring Planning Authority to Regard Public Convenience and Safety.

The Bombay High Court adjudicated a writ petition filed by Unity Mall Premises Co-operative Society against Vasai-Virar City Municipal Corporation and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.2457 OF 2012

The Bombay High Court was seized with four writ petitions filed by various trade unions representing aircraft engineers, technical staff, and technici...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds That Power Under Section 60 of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 Is Quasi-Judicial and Requires Speaking Orders. The appellate authority must assign reasons while disposing of appeals under Section 60 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951.

The case arose from a reference made by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court (Coram: Nitin Jamdar & Sarang V. Kotwal, JJ.) which did not agree wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Challenge to Composite Show Cause Notice Issued Under Section 74 of CGST Act for Multiple Tax Periods

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development and registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, filed a writ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act in Property Development Dispute. Petitioners Argue Award is Unreasoned and Arbitrator Failed to Independently Analyze Submissions, Seeking Set Aside.

Background: The matter involved a property development dispute concerning three tribal (Adivasi) lands in Malad, Mumbai. The petitioners were legal he...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Under Section 21 of NIA Act as Not Maintainable Against Interlocutory Order. The court held that an order on an interlocutory application under Section 20 of the NIA Act is not a final judgment and thus not appealable under Section 21 of the Act.

The case involves a criminal appeal filed under Section 21 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 (NIA Act) by four appellants, Irfan Pasha, W...