Case Note & Summary
The writ petition arose from a challenge to the judgment and order dated 12 April 2019 in Revision Application No. NIL/2011 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Nashik, which dismissed the petitioner's revision against a recovery certificate issued under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 and the subsequent auction sale of agricultural land. The petitioner had availed a loan of Rs.75,000 from respondent No.3 society on 18 October 2005, repayable within 60 months, and had mortgaged House No.728 under a mortgage deed dated 21 October 2005. The respondent No.3 society applied for a recovery certificate on 8 October 2009, and the District Deputy Registrar, Jalgaon issued it on 9 December 2009. The petitioner contended that the certificate was issued mechanically without a reasoned order in violation of Rules 86-A to 86-F of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961, and that the demand notice under Rule 107 did not comply with Rule 107(3) and 107(11)(b) as it lacked exact outstanding amount, interest details, and property particulars. The auction sale of agricultural land bearing Gat No. 49 took place on 18 October 2011 after a newspaper notice on 6 September 2011, and was confirmed on 31 March 2012. The petitioner alleged that the sale of the entire land admeasuring 3 Acre and 11 Are, valued at about Rs.2 crores, was conducted for a throwaway price of Rs.21,01,000 to recover only Rs.1,31,769 plus interest, without prior attachment as required under Rule 107(10) and Rule 107(11)(d), and without first proceeding against the mortgaged property under Rule 107(4). The petitioner also claimed denial of his right to pay under Rule 107(13). The petitioner first filed a revision in 2011, which was dismissed on 16 May 2012. A subsequent writ petition, Writ Petition No. 7113 of 2012, was partly allowed on 1 August 2018, remanding the matter to the Divisional Joint Registrar. After remand, the revision was again dismissed on 12 April 2019 on grounds that the petitioner had not raised objection under Rule 107(12) to (14), had not made pre-deposit under Section 154(2A), and that the challenge to the recovery certificate was barred by limitation. The authorities also held that there was no violation of Rule 107 and no substantial injury to the petitioner. The High Court stayed the auction sale on 10 May 2019 subject to deposit of Rs.6,04,619. The present judgment reserved on 27 April 2021 and pronounced on 25 May 2021, but the provided text ends before the court's final analysis and decision are stated.
Issue of Consideration
Whether the Divisional Joint Registrar erred in dismissing the revision application on grounds of non-compliance with Rule 107(12) to (14), failure to make pre-deposit under Section 154(2A), and limitation; whether the recovery certificate dated 9 December 2009 was validly issued under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 and Rules 86-A to 86-F; whether the demand notice and auction sale complied with Rule 107, particularly regarding prior attachment, sale of mortgaged property first, and proportionality of selling entire land for a smaller outstanding amount.
Law Points
- Recovery certificate under Section 101 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act
- 1961 requires reasoned order under Rule 86-A to 86-F of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules
- 1961
- Demand notice must comply with Rule 107(3) read with Rule 107(11)(b) of the Rules
- Sale must proceed first against mortgaged property under Rule 107(4)
- Prior attachment is mandatory before sale under Rule 107(10) read with Rule 107(11)(d)
- Borrower has right to pay outstanding amount under Rule 107(13)
- Revision under Section 154 of the Act requires pre-deposit under sub-section (2A)
- Challenge to recovery certificate must be within limitation
- Sale should be limited to portion necessary to recover dues and not entire property if disproportionate
- Auction sale may be invalid if sold before fixing upset price or for throwaway price.
Case Details
2021 LawText (BOM) (05) 27
Writ Petition No. 5627 of 2019
Subodh P. Shah for petitioner; G.O. Wattamwar, AGP for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 7; V.D. Hon, Senior Advocate for respondent Nos. 3 and 4; Abasaheb Shinde for respondent Nos. 8 and 9
Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Nashik; Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Nashik; Purnavad Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha, Maryadit, Shirsoli; Special Recovery Officer; Madhukar Fakira Bari; Kailas Kachru Patil; District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Jalgaon; Mahendra Narayan Kedar; Anil Totaram Shimpi
Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more)
Subscribe Now
Nature of Litigation
Writ petition challenging the order of the Divisional Joint Registrar dismissing a revision application against a recovery certificate issued under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 and the confirmation of auction sale of agricultural land.
Remedy Sought
Petitioner sought quashing of the impugned judgment dated 12 April 2019, setting aside of the recovery certificate dated 9 December 2009 and the auction sale of agricultural land confirmed on 31 March 2012, and restoration of possession over the subject land.
Filing Reason
Petitioner alleged that the recovery certificate was issued without a reasoned order contrary to Rules 86-A to 86-F; the demand notice did not comply with Rule 107(3) and 107(11)(b); the sale of non-mortgaged land occurred without prior attachment under Rule 107(10) and 107(11)(d); the entire land was sold for a disproportionately small amount; and petitioner was denied the right to pay under Rule 107(13).
Previous Decisions
Earlier revision application dismissed on 16 May 2012; Writ Petition No. 7113 of 2012 partly allowed on 1 August 2018 remanding the matter to the revisional authority; after remand, revision again dismissed on 12 April 2019.
Issues
Validity of recovery certificate under Section 101 and compliance with Rules 86-A to 86-F of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961
Compliance with Rule 107 regarding demand notice, prior attachment, sale of mortgaged property first, and proportionality of selling entire land
Maintainability of revision application under Section 154(2A) of the Act and requirement of pre-deposit
Limitation for challenging the recovery certificate through amendment in 2018
Denial of petitioner's right to pay outstanding amount under Rule 107(13)
Submissions/Arguments
Petitioner argued that the recovery certificate was issued mechanically without a reasoned order in violation of Rules 86-A to 86-F
Petitioner contended that the demand notice under Rule 107 did not comply with Rule 107(3) and 107(11)(b) as it lacked exact outstanding amount, interest details, and property particulars
Petitioner submitted that the sale of non-mortgaged subject land without prior attachment was in breach of Rule 107(4), 107(10), and 107(11)(d)
Petitioner alleged that auction sale was conducted before fixing upset price and sold the entire land for a throwaway price, contrary to the rule that only necessary portion should be sold
Petitioner claimed denial of right under Rule 107(13) to pay the outstanding amount
Respondents argued that revision was not tenable because petitioner did not raise objection under Rule 107(12) to (14) and did not make pre-deposit under Section 154(2A)
Respondents contended that the challenge to the recovery certificate was barred by limitation
Respondents asserted that there was no violation of Rule 107 and no substantial injury; the land was sold for more than thrice the upset price fixed by respondent No.7
Judgment Excerpts
The challenge in this petition is to the judgment and order dated 12th April 2019 in Revision Application No.NIL/2011 passed by Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Nashik, whereby the revision application preferred by the petitioner assailing the legality, propriety and correctness of the recovery certificate issued under section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 and the steps taken by respondent No.3-Society and respondent No.4, the Recovery Officer, to recover the amount thereunder, culminating in the order of confirmation of sale dated 31st March 2012 of agricultural land bearing Gat No. 49 in favour of respondent Nos. 8 and 9 came to be dismissed.
The District Deputy Registrar, Jalgaon-respondent No.7 issued the recovery certificate on 9th December 2009 in a mechanical manner without complying with the mandatory requirement of passing a reasoned order, in clear violation of Rule 86-A to 86-F of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961.
The Revisional Authority was of the view that the revision application was not tenable on multiple counts. First, since the petitioner had neither preferred application nor raised objection in the manner envisaged by Rule 107(12) to (14) of the Rules, 1961 the challenge to the auction sale in a revision under section 154 of the Act, 1960 was not competent. Second, in view of the failure of the petitioner to make pre-deposit envisaged by sub-section (2A) of section 154 of the Act, 1960, no application for revision could be entertained. Third, though the recovery certificate was issued on 9th December 2009 by the Deputy Registrar, Jalgaon, its legality was sought to be assailed by the petitioner by way of amendment in the year 2018. The challenge to the recovery certificate by way of a revision application, preferred in the year 2011, and the amendment thereto, in the year 2018, was, thus, barred by limitation.
By an order dated 10th May 2019, this Court stayed the effect, implementation and operation of the auction sale and protected the possession of the petitioner over the subject land, subject to deposit of a sum of Rs.6,04,619/-, which was then stated to be outstanding.
Procedural History
Petitioner availed loan from respondent No.3 society on 18 October 2005; respondent No.3 applied for recovery certificate on 8 October 2009; District Deputy Registrar issued certificate on 9 December 2009; notice of auction sale published on 6 September 2011; auction sale held on 18 October 2011; revision application filed by petitioner in 2011; respondent No.7 confirmed sale on 31 March 2012; Divisional Joint Registrar dismissed revision on 16 May 2012; petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 7113 of 2012, which was partly allowed on 1 August 2018 remanding matter; post remand petitioner amended revision; Divisional Joint Registrar dismissed revision again on 12 April 2019; petitioner filed present Writ Petition No. 5627 of 2019; High Court stayed auction sale on 10 May 2019 subject to deposit of Rs.6,04,619; judgment reserved on 27 April 2021 and pronounced on 25 May 2021.
Acts & Sections
- Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1961: Section 101, Section 154 (including sub-section 2A)
- Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961: Rule 86-A to 86-F, Rule 107 (sub-rules (3), (4), (10), (11)(b), (11)(d), (12) to (14), (13))