WRIT PETITION NO.4044 OF 2015
19 May 2015These are a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction. The petitioners are various tra...
Search Results for "District President"
2250 result(s) found
Found 2250 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Intent to Humiliate. Allegations of Caste-Based Insults Failed as Utterances Were Made in Service Dispute Context, Not with Intent to Humiliate Under Section 3(1)(r) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
22 Nov 2019The petitioners, who were employees of a cooperative bank, filed a criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 15/2019 registered at Newasa Pol...
- 97
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Discharge of District Judge in NSEL Scam Case — Rule 13(4)(ii)(b) of MJS Rules Violates Articles 14 and 311(2) as It Imposes Penalty Without Inquiry. The court held that discharge of a probationer without inquiry is punitive and unconstitutional.
30 Jan 2020The petitioner, Ajay Ramesh Dinode, was appointed as a District Judge by nomination in August 2014 and posted as Additional District and Sessions Judg...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Batch of Petitions Challenging APMC Nagpur Election Process and Government Orders Extending Board Tenure
16 Jan 2018The judgment pertains to multiple writ petitions and a contempt petition concerning the elections and administration of the Agricultural Produce Marke...
- 56
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Patta Transfer as Not Maintainable Due to Lack of Public Interest and Personal Interest of Petitioner. The court held that a writ petition filed under the guise of public interest litigation, where the petitioner has a personal interest in the subject matter, is not maintainable and is liable to be dismissed.
22 Jan 2025The petitioner, Muthuramalingam, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, styled as a Public Interest Litigation, challen...
- 72
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Jurisdiction of District Election Officer to Postpone Cooperative Society Elections After Issuance of Calendar of Events. Writ Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India Challenging the Order Dated 08.09.2023 Passed by the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies.
4 Dec 2023The writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging an order dated 08.09.2023 issued by the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative ...
- 11
High Court
Madras High Court Directs Removal of Unauthorized Temple Construction Without Permission. Unauthourised Structure on Road Adjacency Ordered Removed Under Article 226 with Liberty for Builder to Apply for Regularisation.
13 Feb 2025The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Arumugam @ Aarusamy seeking a mandamus to direct respondents 1 to 7 to r...
- 19
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging State Commission's Direction to Register Revision as Appeal in Consumer Dispute — Section 47(1)(b) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 Does Not Permit Revision Against Final Order of District Commission; Appeal is the Appropriate Remedy.
13 Mar 2024The petitioner, Harish Ramesh Gawai, a director of Laxmi Swapnapurti Planners & Developers Private Limited, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High C...
High Court
Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation on Encroachment of Government Lands and Common Pathway. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, warranting a direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
27 Jan 2025The petitioner, A. Devadass, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct respondents 1 t...
- 107
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat President — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the mandatory 15-day notice period was not complied with, rendering the no-confidence motion and resolution invalid.
12 Dec 2018The petitioner, Sri Harisha I.E., was the President of Ichanahally Gram Panchayat. A no-confidence motion was moved against him by the respondents, wh...
- 92
