Search Results for "Boundary Dispute"

672 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 672 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against College Principal in SC/ST Act and Sexual Harassment Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Allegations of Caste-Based Insult and Sexual Harassment Found to Be Vague and Contradictory, Not Attracting Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(w)(ii) of SC/ST Act or Section 354-A IPC.

The applicant, Dr. Shriram Madhusudan Bhuskute, the Principal of Bhawabhuti Mahavidyalaya, Amgaon, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Revenue Authorities for Failing to Execute Decree Despite Supreme Court Confirmation. Court Directs Tahsildar to Execute Decree Within Six Weeks, Imposes Costs for Vexatious Litigation.

The petitioner, Gangabai Ramrao Patil, entered into an agreement to sell land with the respondents in 1973. When the respondents failed to execute the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Application in Development Agreement Dispute — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out as Agreement Was Terminated for Non-Performance. Specific Performance Claim Requires Trial; No Irreparable Loss Shown.

The Plaintiffs, Shantilal J. Shah and others, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a Development Agreement dated 25th September 2007 and an Irrevoc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contractor's Suit for Specific Performance and Allows Society's Counterclaim for Damages in Construction Dispute. Agreement dated 13th March 1978 held valid but not specifically enforceable due to mutual breaches and failure to prove readiness and willingness.

The judgment concerns two cross-suits between M/s. Shanti Builders (a building contractor) and CIBA Industrial Workers' Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. (t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Development Rights Certificate for Recreation Ground Amenity Under Regulation 34 of DCR 1991. Owner entitled to TDR for construction upon developing and handing over reserved amenity free of cost.

The petitioners, Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a wri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Decree for Specific Performance Set Aside as Plaintiff Did Not Show Continuous Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellants (original defendants) challenged the order of the Extra Adhoc District Judge, Kelapur, dated 19.1.2011, in Regular Civil Appeal No.181 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Proceedings Against Timber Purchasers for Fire-Destroyed Goods. Property in Timber Not Passed to Purchasers Under Sale of Goods Act, 1930, Hence No Liability Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.

The petitioners, fifteen timber merchants, participated in an auction conducted by the Forest Department on 16.04.2008 and 15.05.2008 for the purchase...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation to Rs. 60,000 per Acre. Court holds that sale instances from nearby villages and a valuer's report cannot be ignored while determining market value under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case pertains to a land acquisition dispute where the appellants, Rambhau Baliram Wandhe and Dhrupadabai Baliram Wandhe, owned agricultural land i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Illegal Construction in Residential Zone. Unauthorized construction in residential zone without valid development permission is liable for demolition under MRTP Act and BMC Act.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Sharvan Developers Private Limited and others, and by Jayesh Mehta and others, challenging a demolition ...