Search Results for "Bandra"

1660 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1660 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Eviction Notices under Slum Act in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. Petitioners Challenged Eviction Notices Issued under Sections 33 and 38 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, Alleging Lack of Section 3C(1) Declaration.

The matter arose from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by Om-Sai Darshan Cooperative Housing Society (Proposed) an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Interim Measures in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act, Citing Public Interest in Airport Development. Termination of Determinable Contract Not Stayed as Injunction Would Amount to Specific Performance Barred Under Specific Relief Act.

The case arose from a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Housing Development and Infrastructure Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Rights of Juvenile Offender; Directs Production Before Judicial Officer Holding Charge. Medical Report Disclosing Juvenility Not Acted Upon, Leading to Violation of Juvenile Justice Act, 2000; Investigating Agency's Primary Obligation Affirmed.

The petitioner, a juvenile offender, was arrested on 23 April 2004 and remanded to judicial custody. A charge-sheet was filed on 5 May 2004, but the p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Slum Rehabilitation Area Declaration Where No Show Cause Notice Was Issued. The Court Examines Whether Principles of Natural Justice Require Opportunity of Hearing Before Section 3C(1) Declaration Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

This writ petition was filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the declaration of certain property as a Slum Rehabilitation Area under Section 3C(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Auto Rickshaw Unions' Challenge to Mandatory Electronic Digital Fare Meter Fitment in Larger Consumer Interest. Notification under Rule 137 of Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 Upheld as Valid Exercise of State's Legislative Competence Despite Petitioners' Hardship Claims.

The Bombay High Court heard and dismissed two writ petitions challenging a State Government notification making electronic digital fare meters mandato...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Decides Challenge to SRA Order Approving Termination of Development Agreement and Appointment of New Developer. The Court examined the legality of the order under Section 13 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, and the requirement of fair hearing.

The petitioner, Shivkupa Builders & Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 14 October 2009 passed by the Ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Revision Petition under Section 297 CrPC Dismissed by Court. Court Rejects Application Challenging Discharge Denial in Enemy Property Case

The Applicant has filed a revision application under Section 297 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the order dated 28 July 2023 by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.

The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty on Development Agreement Under Section 47(c)(5) of Maharashtra Stamp Act — Purpose of Instrument Failed. Development Agreement is an instrument covered under Section 47(c)(5) for refund when the purpose fails, and Section 48 is only a limitation provision.

The petitioner, M/s. Chandiwala Enterprises, a registered partnership firm, entered into a Development Agreement with Neel Ashiward CHS Ltd. on 2nd Se...