Search Results for "Arbitration petition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Arbitration petition"

2679 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2679 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Under Section 37 Against Interim Order Under Section 9 in Property Development Arbitration. The Impugned Order Granted Conditional Relief Including Injunction and Appointment of Receiver Pending Arbitration.

27 Oct 2005

The appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Clause 15 of the Letters Patent challenged an order passed by a le...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition to Restore Suit Dismissed for Default, Setting Aside Order That Rejected Restoration on Ground of Arbitration Agreement. Court holds that dismissal for default does not bar restoration and that the trial court must decide the application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 on merits.

25 Sep 2025

The petitioner, K. M. Dastagir Sab, filed a suit (O.S.No.1280/2020) before the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, seeking rel...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Regularization of Contract Labour as Permanent Workmen. Employer Failed to Prove Genuineness of Contract Labour System, and Concurrent Findings of Fact by Industrial Tribunal and Appellate Authority Were Not Perverse.

28 Sep 2012

The case involves a writ petition filed by Western Coalfields Limited (the employer) under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challengi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Matter — No Provision for Review Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Review petition under Section 114 CPC held not maintainable against order under Sections 27(1) and 27(2) of the Act.

16 Oct 2015

The review petitioner, National Insurance Company Limited, filed a review petition under Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking reca...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Upholding Arbitrator's Order That Certain Claims Were Beyond Scope of Reference. The Court Held That the Arbitrator Correctly Applied the Principle That Claims Not Covered by the Reference Cannot Be Adjudicated.

3 Sep 2013

The appellant, Ameyas Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Port Development Dispute — Liquidated Damages Claim Rejected Due to Lack of Proof of Actual Loss. The court held that under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, proof of actual loss is necessary for claiming liquidated damages, and the arbitrator's finding was not patently illegal.

10 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Board of Trustees for Jawaharlal Nehru Port, a body corporate under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, entered into a licence agreement ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Infrastructure Dispute Over Concession Agreement — State's Objection on Limitation Rejected as Arbitrability Question for Tribunal. The court held that the issue of limitation is a matter for the arbitrator to decide under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a BOT project.

19 Sep 2017

The applicant, Kakade Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appoin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay in Filing Section 34 Petition as Limitation Period Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration Act is Not Extendable Beyond 30 Days. Delay of 31 days beyond the prescribed period of three months cannot be condoned as the proviso allows only a further 30 days and no more.

29 Apr 2016

The applicant, Jolly Brothers Pvt. Ltd., filed a Notice of Motion seeking condonation of delay of 31 days in filing a petition under Section 34 of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Substitution of Arbitrator in Arbitration Dispute Over Shareholder and Trademark Agreements — Termination Orders Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the arbitral tribunal failed to provide reasonable opportunity before terminating its mandate under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and appointed a substitute arbitrator.

11 Aug 2016

The petitioner, The Comedy Store, a UK company, and the respondent, Horseshoe Entertainment & Hospitality Pvt. Ltd., entered into a Share Subscription...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Application for Unregistered Partnership Firm. Section 69(3) of the Partnership Act, 1932 Bars Interim Relief Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Unregistered Firm.

15 Dec 2006

The appellant, Masood Mohmmed Husain, filed an appeal against the rejection of his application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act...

54 55 56 57 58

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)