Search Results for "Appellate Side Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Appellate Side Rules"

2600 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2600 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Contempt Petition Filed Against Municipal Officials for Alleged Violation of Court Order; Court Examines Procedural Requirement of Notice. The Court Analysed the Bombay High Court Rules Regarding Contempt Proceedings and Held That the Initial Notice under Rule 8 is Sufficient for Proceeding with the Contempt Petition.

4 Aug 2006

The contempt petition arose from a property dispute between a charitable trust, Saurashtra Vanza Gnyati Yuvak Mandal, and the Municipal Corporation of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Doctor for Minor Deficiencies Under PCPNDT Act. Minor Lapses in Record-Keeping Do Not Warrant Prosecution Under Sections 23 and 28 of the Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994.

27 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Sai Shiradkar, a medical practitioner running Suyog Hospital in Nanded, filed a criminal writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Disciplinary Jurisdiction of Medical Council of India Over Doctors in Maharashtra Medical Council Act Challenge. Court Considers Whether MCI Has Power to Remove Names from State Register and Whether Natural Justice Was Violated.

14 Oct 2015

These writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenge orders passed by the Medical Council of India (MCI) and the Maharashtra ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Landlord's Appeal in Eviction Case, Restores Decree; Advocate's No-Instruction Puris Not a Withdrawal of Vakalatnama Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Evasive Litigant Cannot Claim Lack of Opportunity When Advocate Sent RPAD Notice and No Formal Withdrawal of Vakalatnama Occurred.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from a civil suit for possession filed by the landlord-appellant under Sections 16(1)(g) and 16(1)(n) of the Maharashtra Rent Contro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Eye-Witnesses Were Inconsistent and Motive Not Proven.

11 Mar 2010

The appellant, Akalesh Kumar @ Mithun Sharad Mishra, was convicted by the Sessions Court for Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.417 of 1996 with Sessi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Section 14A Applies to Dividend Income and Examines Constitutional Validity of Rule 8D. The Court analyzed whether income excluded under Section 10(33) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 constitutes 'income which does not form part of the total income' under Section 14A, and whether subsections (2) and (3) and Rule 8D apply retrospectively.

12 Aug 2010

The matter involved an income tax appeal and a writ petition before the Bombay High Court arising out of disallowance under Section 14A of the Income ...

High Court

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.626 OF 2010

12 Aug 2010

The assessee, Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., filed its income tax return for Assessment Year 2002-03 declaring a loss of Rs. 45.90 crores and claimed a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers PIL on Infrastructure of Judiciary; Examines Primacy of High Court's Recommendations for Additional Courts. Court Notes State Government's Delays and Insistence That Its Own Views Prevail, Highlighting Need for 867 Additional Courts and Special Courts for Vulnerable Groups.

11 Oct 2018

This public interest litigation was instituted by a chartered accountant, Vihar Durve, raising concerns about the infrastructure of the judiciary in t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Under Article 227 Challenging Panchayat Demolition Order — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Concurrent Findings of Unauthorized Construction. The court upheld the concurrent findings of the Panchayat and Appellate Authority that the construction was unauthorized under the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, and refused to interfere under Article 227.

9 Oct 2018

The petitioners, three companies registered under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged an order dated 17/06/2015 passed by the Appellate Authority and ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Assessee's Belated Challenge to Penalty Notice in Income Tax Appeal; Court Examines Whether 30-Year-Old Defect in Notice Under Section 271(1)(c) Can Vitiate Penalty Absent Prejudice. The court focused on the threshold test of factual prejudice and whether a technical plea not raised before lower forums can be urged in a Section 260A appeal.

11 Jan 2024

The appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Income-tax...

54 55 56 57 58

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)