Search Results for "substantive offence"

2154 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2154 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Categorization Under 1992 Guidelines for Premature Release of Life Convict in Murder During Robbery Case. Petitioner's Offence of Murder During Robbery Correctly Categorized Under Category 5(a) of the 1992 Guidelines, Which Superseded the 1978 Guidelines.

The petitioner, Harjeetsingh Niranjansingh Jabbal, was convicted under Sections 302 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code for murder committed during a rob...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Penetration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Support Rape Allegation and Prosecution Witnesses Contradicted Each Other.

The appellant, Balaji Malhari Devkate, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhokar, District Nanded, for the offence of rape under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Voluntary Accompaniment. Prosecutrix's Voluntary Conduct and Delayed FIR Undermine Allegations Under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC.

The appellant, Rajan Kannan Padiyachi, was convicted by the 1st Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, in Sessions Case No.159 of 1997 for offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheating Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Deception. Conviction under Section 417 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that accused made false promise with intent to deceive complainant.

The appellant, Shankar, was convicted by the I Additional Sessions Judge, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore, in S.C. No. 78/2005 for the offence punishable ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction Under Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, C. Krishnaiah, was accused no. 2 in a corruption case before the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mysore, in Spl. Case No. 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Forest Assault Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 353 and 307 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove appellant's presence at the scene beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Thomas, was accused No.2 in a case arising from an incident on 18.07.2006 where a group of persons allegedly assaulted forest officials...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Discharge Application of Accused in Bank Fraud Case Due to Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy. Allegations of conspiracy between bank officials and partners of a firm to sanction credit facilities beyond limits and misappropriate funds under IPC and PC Act warrant trial.

The applicant, original accused no.5, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 challenging the order dat...